These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36457227)
61. A potential in vitro epidermal equivalent assay to determine sensitizer potency. dos Santos GG; Spiekstra SW; Sampat-Sardjoepersad SC; Reinders J; Scheper RJ; Gibbs S Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Feb; 25(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 20940038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. 4-phenylpyridine suppresses UVB-induced skin inflammation by targeting c-Src in vitro and in vivo. Kim JG; Kang HY; Kim MJ; Lim S; Lee CJ; Kim KM; Jung SK J Cell Mol Med; 2022 Jul; 26(14):3891-3901. PubMed ID: 35686492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Multi-laboratory Validation Study of the Vitrigel-Eye Irritancy Test Method as an Alternative to Kojima H; Yamaguchi H; Sozu T; Kleinstreuer N; Chae-Hyung L; Chen W; Watanabe M; Fukuda T; Yamashita K; Takezawa T Altern Lab Anim; 2019; 47(3-4):140-157. PubMed ID: 31838865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Differential induction of cutaneous TNF-alpha and IL-6 by topically applied chemicals. Holliday MR; Corsini E; Smith S; Basketter DA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9249285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Different characteristics of reactive oxygen species production by human keratinocyte cell line cells in response to allergens and irritants. Kim DH; Byamba D; Wu WH; Kim TG; Lee MG Exp Dermatol; 2012 Feb; 21(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 22141451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. A catch-up validation study of an in vitro skin irritation test method using reconstructed human epidermis LabCyte EPI-MODEL24. Kojima H; Katoh M; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Suzuki T; Izumi R; Yamaguchi Y; Nakamura M; Kasahawa T; Shibai A J Appl Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 34(7):766-74. PubMed ID: 24122860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. An in vitro skin irritation test (SIT) using the EpiDerm reconstructed human epidermal (RHE) model. Kandárová H; Hayden P; Klausner M; Kubilus J; Sheasgreen J J Vis Exp; 2009 Jul; (29):. PubMed ID: 19597414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Human skin in organ culture and human skin cells (keratinocytes and fibroblasts) in monolayer culture for assessment of chemically induced skin damage. Varani J; Perone P; Spahlinger DM; Singer LM; Diegel KL; Bobrowski WF; Dunstan R Toxicol Pathol; 2007 Aug; 35(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 17763283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. A simplified index to quantify the irritation/corrosion potential of chemicals - Part I: Skin. Charmeau-Genevois C; Sarang S; Perea M; Eadsforth C; Austin T; Thomas P Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 123():104922. PubMed ID: 33819554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Quantitative assessment of primary skin irritants in vitro in a cytotoxicity model: comparison with in vivo human irritation tests. Wilhelm KP; Böttjer B; Siegers CP Br J Dermatol; 2001 Nov; 145(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 11736893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Induction of cytokine (interleukin-1alpha and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) and chemokine (CCL20, CCL27, and CXCL8) alarm signals after allergen and irritant exposure. Spiekstra SW; Toebak MJ; Sampat-Sardjoepersad S; van Beek PJ; Boorsma DM; Stoof TJ; von Blomberg BM; Scheper RJ; Bruynzeel DP; Rustemeyer T; Gibbs S Exp Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 14(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 15679580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Identification of potential biomarkers for predicting acute dermal irritation by proteomic analysis. Zhang Q; Dai T; Zhang L; Zhang M; Xiao X; Hu H; Zou P; Liu X; Xiang Q; Su Z; Huang Y; He QY J Appl Toxicol; 2011 Nov; 31(8):762-72. PubMed ID: 21469165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor signal transduction pathway stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of protein kinase C delta. Denning MF; Dlugosz AA; Threadgill DW; Magnuson T; Yuspa SH J Biol Chem; 1996 Mar; 271(10):5325-31. PubMed ID: 8621384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Comparison of irritant potential of shampoos using cultured human epidermal keratinocytes model and patch test reaction measured by laser Doppler flowmetry. Eun HC; Jung SY Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Mar; 30(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 8187517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Predictive ability of reconstructed human epidermis equivalents for the assessment of skin irritation of cosmetics. Faller C; Bracher M; Dami N; Roguet R Toxicol In Vitro; 2002 Oct; 16(5):557-72. PubMed ID: 12206823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. [Study on feasibility of HaCaT epidermal model as an alternative to skin irritation Liu Y; Lu T; Zhou Z; Lu Y; Zhang Y Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1262-1266. PubMed ID: 29806332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Prediction of ocular irritancy potential from dermal irritation test results. Williams SJ Food Chem Toxicol; 1984 Feb; 22(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 6538165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Mechanistic-based non-animal assessment of eye toxicity: Inflammatory profile of human keratinocytes cells after exposure to eye damage/irritant agents. da Silva ACG; Chialchia AR; de Ávila RI; Valadares MC Chem Biol Interact; 2018 Aug; 292():1-8. PubMed ID: 29953848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Leiden reconstructed human epidermal model as a tool for the evaluation of the skin corrosion and irritation potential according to the ECVAM guidelines. El Ghalbzouri A; Siamari R; Willemze R; Ponec M Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Aug; 22(5):1311-20. PubMed ID: 18474418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A new alternative method for testing skin irritation using a human skin model: a pilot study. Miles A; Berthet A; Hopf NB; Gilliet M; Raffoul W; Vernez D; Spring P Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Mar; 28(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 24211334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]