These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36458873)

  • 1. Humans can monitor trial-based but not global timing errors: Evidence for relative judgements in temporal error monitoring.
    Öztel T; Balcı F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):2155-2163. PubMed ID: 36458873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal error monitoring with directional error magnitude judgements: a robust phenomenon with no effect of being watched.
    Öztel T; Eskenazi T; Balcı F
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jul; 85(5):2069-2078. PubMed ID: 32623511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of feedback on temporal error monitoring and timing behavior.
    Riemer M; Kubik V; Wolbers T
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 369():111929. PubMed ID: 31047923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metric error monitoring: Another generalized mechanism for magnitude representations?
    Yallak E; Balcı F
    Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104532. PubMed ID: 33571813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metric error monitoring for a cleaner record of timing.
    Yallak E; Balcı F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1130-1136. PubMed ID: 35980703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal error monitoring: Does agency matter?
    Öztel T; Balcı F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39424702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory Feedback Assists
    Mitani K; Kashino M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2325. PubMed ID: 29403407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rodents monitor their error in self-generated duration on a single trial basis.
    Kononowicz TW; van Wassenhove V; Doyère V
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Mar; 119(9):. PubMed ID: 35193973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are you early or late?: Temporal error monitoring.
    Akdoğan B; Balcı F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Mar; 146(3):347-361. PubMed ID: 28080127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Awareness of errors and feedback in human time estimation.
    Bader F; Wiener M
    Learn Mem; 2021 May; 28(5):171-177. PubMed ID: 33858970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrasting contributions of movement onset and duration to self-evaluation of sensorimotor timing performance.
    Jovanovic L; López-Moliner J; Mamassian P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Aug; 54(3):5092-5111. PubMed ID: 34196067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mice monitor their timing errors.
    Öztel T; Balcı F
    Sci Rep; 2024 Oct; 14(1):23356. PubMed ID: 39375395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of alcohol administration on human timing: a comparison of prospective timing, retrospective timing and passage of time judgements.
    Ogden RS; Wearden JH; Gallagher DT; Montgomery C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):254-62. PubMed ID: 21802649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of feedback on three phases of performance monitoring.
    Appelgren A; Penny W; Bengtsson SL
    Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 24217138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal-signal detection and individual differences in timing.
    Brown SW; Newcomb DC; Kahrl KG
    Perception; 1995; 24(5):525-38. PubMed ID: 7567428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid recalibration of temporal order judgements: Response bias accounts for contradictory results.
    Keane B; Bland NS; Matthews N; Carroll TJ; Wallis G
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 51(7):1697-1710. PubMed ID: 31430402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in first- and second-order temporal judgment.
    Corcoran AW; Groot C; Bruno A; Johnston A; Cropper SJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191422. PubMed ID: 29401520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When temporal prediction errs: ERP responses to delayed action-feedback onset.
    Pinheiro AP; Schwartze M; Gutierrez F; Kotz SA
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107200. PubMed ID: 31557484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Self-generated Behavior: Untangling Metacognitive Readout and Error Detection.
    Kononowicz TW; van Wassenhove V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Nov; 31(11):1641-1657. PubMed ID: 31274392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.