These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test. Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response. Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study. Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation. Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Speech-to-Noise Ratio and Luminance on a Range of Current and Potential Pupil Response Measures to Assess Listening Effort. Książek P; Zekveld AA; Wendt D; Fiedler L; Lunner T; Kramer SE Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211009351. PubMed ID: 33926329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task. Zhang Y; Lehmann A; Deroche M PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0233251. PubMed ID: 33657100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study. Wendt D; Hietkamp RK; Lunner T Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 28640038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Speech Intelligibility, Noise Reduction Processing, and Working Memory Capacity on the Pupil Dilation Response. Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):392-404. PubMed ID: 34898265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech recognition in noise task among children and young-adults: a pupillometry study. Trau-Margalit A; Fostick L; Harel-Arbeli T; Nissanholtz-Gannot R; Taitelbaum-Swead R Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1188485. PubMed ID: 37425148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise. Książek P; Zekveld AA; Fiedler L; Kramer SE; Wendt D Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231153280. PubMed ID: 36938784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An exploratory Study of EEG Alpha Oscillation and Pupil Dilation in Hearing-Aid Users During Effortful listening to Continuous Speech. Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Wendt D; Alickovic E; Whitmer WM; Lunner T PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235782. PubMed ID: 32649733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in Noise? A Pupillometry Study. Bönitz H; Lunner T; Finke M; Fiedler L; Lyxell B; Riis SK; Ng E; Valdes AL; Büchner A; Wendt D Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):846-859. PubMed ID: 33492008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pupillometry Assessment of Speech Recognition and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Patients. Russo FY; Hoen M; Karoui C; Demarcy T; Ardoint M; Tuset MP; De Seta D; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Mosnier I Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():556675. PubMed ID: 33240035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses. Micula A; Rönnberg J; Fiedler L; Wendt D; Jørgensen MC; Larsen DK; Ng EHN Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1668-1679. PubMed ID: 33859121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of SNR, peripheral auditory sensitivity, and central cognitive profile on the psychometric relation between pupillary response and speech performance in CI users. Zhang Y; Callejón-Leblic MA; Picazo-Reina AM; Blanco-Trejo S; Patou F; Sánchez-Gómez S Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1307777. PubMed ID: 38188029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effects of Light Level and Signal-to-Noise Ratio on the Task-Evoked Pupil Response in a Speech-in-Noise Task. Baldock J; Kapadia S; van Steenbrugge W; McCarley J J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1964-1975. PubMed ID: 38690971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]