These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36460491)

  • 1. Digital acoustic analysis of the first three formant frequencies in patients with a prosthesis after maxillectomy.
    Wang Y; Hattori M; Liu R; Sumita YI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 36460491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Praat and Computerized Speech Lab for formant analysis of five Japanese vowels in maxillectomy patients.
    Ali IE; Sumita Y; Wakabayashi N
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1098197. PubMed ID: 36816122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digitized Speech Characteristics in Patients with Maxillectomy Defects.
    Elbashti ME; Sumita YI; Hattori M; Aswehlee AM; Taniguchi H
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):649-655. PubMed ID: 29210525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of articulation simulation system using artificial maxillectomy models.
    Elbashti ME; Hattori M; Sumita YI; Taniguchi H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Sep; 42(9):678-84. PubMed ID: 25975670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digitised evaluation of speech intelligibility using vowels in maxillectomy patients.
    Sumita YI; Hattori M; Murase M; Elbashti ME; Taniguchi H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 45(3):216-221. PubMed ID: 29205443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detailed speech evaluation including formant 3 analysis and voice visualization in maxillofacial rehabilitation: A clinical report.
    Wang Y; Hattori M; Masaki K; Sumita YI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37173176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of Maxillary Defects on Hypernasality of Speech.
    Tripathi A; Gupta A; Arora V
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 26215582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in the quality of life and acoustic speech parameters of patients in various stages of prosthetic rehabilitation with an obturator after maxillectomy.
    Dholam KP; Bachher G; Gurav SV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 31307797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic characteristics of fricatives, amplitude of formants and clarity of speech produced without and with a medical mask.
    Nguyen DD; Chacon A; Payten C; Black R; Sheth M; McCabe P; Novakovic D; Madill C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Mar; 57(2):366-380. PubMed ID: 35166414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectral characteristics of hypernasality in maxillectomy patients.
    Yoshida H; Furuya Y; Shimodaira K; Kanazawa T; Kataoka R; Takahashi K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Aug; 27(8):723-30. PubMed ID: 10931270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency measurement of vowel formants produced by Brazilian children aged between 4 and 8 years.
    Viegas F; Viegas D; Baeck HE
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 25510161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital acoustic analysis of five vowels in maxillectomy patients.
    Sumita YI; Ozawa S; Mukohyama H; Ueno T; Ohyama T; Taniguchi H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jul; 29(7):649-56. PubMed ID: 12153454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech enhancement for listeners with hearing loss based on a model for vowel coding in the auditory midbrain.
    Rao A; Carney LH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Jul; 61(7):2081-91. PubMed ID: 24686228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of sociodemographic, treatment variables, and medical characteristics on quality of life of patients with maxillectomy restored with obturator prostheses.
    Artopoulou II; Karademas EC; Papadogeorgakis N; Papathanasiou I; Polyzois G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):783-789.e4. PubMed ID: 28456369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of obturator bulb height on speech in maxillectomy patients.
    Kwon HB; Chang SW; Lee SH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 20819135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic analyses of speech changes after maxillectomy and prosthodontic management.
    Tobey EA; Lincks J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 2685247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of the speech outcomes in patients with unilateral maxillary defect rehabilitated with maxillary obturator prosthesis].
    Xing GF; Jiao T; Sun J; Jiang YL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Aug; 14(4):352-4. PubMed ID: 16155696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of formant-like features on an automatic vowel classification task.
    de Wet F; Weber K; Boves L; Cranen B; Bengio S; Bourlard H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1781-92. PubMed ID: 15478445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Three kinds of speech evaluation in maxillectomy patients during the fabrication process of a hollow-type obturator].
    Hattori M; Sumita Y; Taniguchi H
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Jun; 80(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 23986953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech evaluation with and without palatal obturator in patients submitted to maxillectomy.
    de Carvalho-Teles V; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Lauris JR
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2006 Dec; 14(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 19089242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.