These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36460558)

  • 1. Distal radius fractures: Classifications concordance among orthopedic residents on a teaching hospital.
    Peña-Martínez VM; Villanueva-Guerra E; Tamez-Mata Y; Simental-Mendía M; Gallardo-Madrid A; Blázquez-Saldaña J; Acosta-Olivo C
    J Orthop Sci; 2024 Jan; 29(1):133-137. PubMed ID: 36460558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
    Wæver D; Madsen ML; Rölfing JHD; Borris LC; Henriksen M; Nagel LL; Thorninger R
    Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are distal radius fracture classifications reproducible? Intra and interobserver agreement.
    Belloti JC; Tamaoki MJ; Franciozi CE; Santos JB; Balbachevsky D; Chap Chap E; Albertoni WM; Faloppa F
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2008 May; 126(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 18711658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A retrospective evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification and Fernandez classification for distal radius fracture.
    Yinjie Y; Gen W; Hongbo W; Chongqing X; Fan Z; Yanqi F; Xuequn W; Wen M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(2):e18508. PubMed ID: 31914022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of classification of distal radial fractures in the Swedish fracture register.
    Bergvall M; Bergdahl C; Ekholm C; Wennergren D
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Jun; 22(1):587. PubMed ID: 34174861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
    Illarramendi A; González Della Valle A; Segal E; De Carli P; Maignon G; Gallucci G
    Int Orthop; 1998; 22(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 9651777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and reproducibility of classifications for distal radius fractures.
    Küçük L; Kumbaracı M; Günay H; Karapınar L; Ozdemir O
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2013; 47(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 23748613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femoral neck fracture: the reliability of radiologic classifications.
    Cazzato G; Oliva MS; Masci G; Vitiello R; Smimmo A; Matrangolo MR; Palmacci O; D'Adamio S; Ziranu A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 22(Suppl 2):1063. PubMed ID: 35078436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
    Andersen DJ; Blair WF; Steyers CM; Adams BD; el-Khouri GY; Brandser EA
    J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 21(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8842946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
    Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of the New AO/OTA Classification for Distal Radius Fractures Compared with the Fernandez Classification.
    Carula BC; Giostri GS; Bebber F; Batista MFDS; Silva FBD; Novak EM
    Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2022 Dec; 57(6):917-923. PubMed ID: 36540737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the new AO/OTA classification of proximal femur fractures.
    Chan G; Hughes K; Barakat A; Edres K; da Assuncao R; Page P; Dawe E
    Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1434-1437. PubMed ID: 33097201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.
    Glen LZQ; Wong JYS; Tay WX; Li TP; Phua SKA; Manohara R; Chee YH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023; 62(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 36690511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The new AO classification system for intertrochanteric fractures allows better agreement than the original AO classification. An inter- and intra-observer agreement evaluation.
    Klaber I; Besa P; Sandoval F; Lobos D; Zamora T; Schweitzer D; Urrutia J
    Injury; 2021 Jan; 52(1):102-105. PubMed ID: 32654847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Distal radius fractures: consistency of the classifications].
    de Oliveira Filho OM; Belangero WD; Teles JB
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2004; 50(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15253028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Four distal radial fracture classification systems tested amongst a large panel of Dutch trauma surgeons.
    Ploegmakers JJ; Mader K; Pennig D; Verheyen CC
    Injury; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1268-72. PubMed ID: 17643439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The comparative study of reliability and reproducibility of distal radius' fracture classification among: AO frykman and Fernandez classification systems.
    Siripakarn Y; Niempoog S; Boontanapibul K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Jan; 96(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 23720978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The IDEAL classification system: a new method for classifying fractures of the distal extremity of the radius - description and reproducibility.
    Belloti JC; dos Santos JB; de Moraes VY; Wink FV; Tamaoki MJ; Faloppa F
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2013; 131(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 24141296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the CT improve inter- and intra-observer agreement for the AO, Fernandez and Universal classification systems for distal radius fractures?
    Arealis G; Galanopoulos I; Nikolaou VS; Lacon A; Ashwood N; Kitsis C
    Injury; 2014 Oct; 45(10):1579-84. PubMed ID: 25042062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is it time to revisit the AO classification of fractures of the distal radius? Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification.
    Plant CE; Hickson C; Hedley H; Parsons NR; Costa ML
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 26033063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.