These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36461708)

  • 1. Critical review of the OSPAR risk-based approach for offshore-produced water discharges.
    Nielsen AF; Baun A; Andersen SI; Skjolding LM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2023 Sep; 19(5):1172-1187. PubMed ID: 36461708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of model averaging of species sensitivity distributions used for regulating produced water discharges.
    Binet MT; Golding LA; Adams MS; Robertson T; Elsdon TS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 Mar; 20(2):498-517. PubMed ID: 37466036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whole Effluent Toxicity Data and Discharge Volumes to Assess the Likelihood that Environmental Risks of Offshore Produced Water Discharges Are Adequately Controlled.
    Karman CC; Smit MG
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jul; 15(4):584-595. PubMed ID: 30884124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Substance-Based and Whole-Effluent Toxicity of Produced Water Discharges from Norwegian Offshore Oil and Gas Installations.
    de Vries P; Jak RG; Frost TK
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Sep; 41(9):2285-2304. PubMed ID: 35723421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of screening tools for environmental hazard and risk to support assessment and subsequent prioritization of effluent discharges from the oil and gas industry.
    Worden JR; Di Paolo C; Whale GF; Eadsforth CV; Michie E; Lindgren A; Smit MGD
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Sep; 17(5):1025-1036. PubMed ID: 33615680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental effects of offshore produced water discharges: A review focused on the Norwegian continental shelf.
    Beyer J; Goksøyr A; Hjermann DØ; Klungsøyr J
    Mar Environ Res; 2020 Dec; 162():105155. PubMed ID: 32992224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving substance information in USEtox
    Saouter E; Aschberger K; Fantke P; Hauschild MZ; Bopp SK; Kienzler A; Paini A; Pant R; Secchi M; Sala S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3450-3462. PubMed ID: 28618056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing Options for Deriving Chemical Ecotoxicity Hazard Values for the European Union Environmental Footprint, Part II.
    Saouter E; Wolff D; Biganzoli F; Versteeg D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Sep; 15(5):796-807. PubMed ID: 31115961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using REACH for the EU Environmental Footprint: Building a Usable Ecotoxicity Database, Part I.
    Saouter E; Biganzoli F; Pant R; Sala S; Versteeg D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Sep; 15(5):783-795. PubMed ID: 31116000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating Exposure and Effect Distributions with the Ecotoxicity Risk Calculator: Case Studies with Crop Protection Products.
    Dreier DA; Rodney SI; Moore DR; Grant SL; Chen W; Valenti TW; Brain RA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Mar; 17(2):321-330. PubMed ID: 32949192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A risk-based, product-level approach for assuring aquatic environmental safety of cleaning products in the context of sustainability: The Environmental Safety Check (ESC) scheme of the A.I.S.E. Charter for Sustainable Cleaning.
    Pickup JA; Dewaele J; Furmanski NL; Kowalczyk A; Luijkx GC; Mathieu S; Stelter N
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):127-138. PubMed ID: 26891423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whole effluent assessment of industrial wastewater for determination of BAT compliance. Part 2: metal surface treatment industry.
    Gartiser S; Hafner C; Hercher C; Kronenberger-Schäfer K; Paschke A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2010 Jun; 17(5):1149-57. PubMed ID: 20127188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporation of sediment- and soil-specific aspects in the Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data (CRED).
    Casado-Martinez M; Dell'Ambrogio G; Campiche S; Kroll A; Lauber E; Marti-Roura M; Mendez-Fernandez L; Renaud M; Tierbach A; Wildi M; Wong JWY; Werner I; Junghans M; Ferrari BJD
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38780110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. European freshwater silver monitoring data do not suggest a potential European-wide risk.
    Arijs K; Viaene K; Van Sprang P; Nys C; Mertens J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2023 Jul; 19(4):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 36571154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of cumulative risks from offshore produced water discharges in the Bass Strait.
    Parkerton TF; Bok M; Ireland AW; Prosser CM
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Jan; 126():610-621. PubMed ID: 29129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the reliability of ecotoxicological studies: An overview of current needs and approaches.
    Moermond C; Beasley A; Breton R; Junghans M; Laskowski R; Solomon K; Zahner H
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):640-651. PubMed ID: 27869364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling of Environmental Fate and Effects of Oil Leakages from Abandoned Subsea Wells Using an Environmental Impact Factor Tool.
    Pham HH; Lohne HP; Arild Ø; Schlenk D; Pampanin DM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 May; 17(3):626-638. PubMed ID: 33448625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Critical Review of the Availability, Reliability, and Ecological Relevance of Arctic Species Toxicity Tests for Use in Environmental Risk Assessment.
    Eldridge RJ; de Jourdan BP; Hanson ML
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Jan; 41(1):46-72. PubMed ID: 34758147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advancing the weight of evidence approach to enable chemical environmental risk assessment for decision-making and achieving protection goals.
    Lee KC; Guiney PD; Menzie CA; Belanger SE
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2023 Sep; 19(5):1188-1191. PubMed ID: 37421247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ecotoxicity testing of microplastics: Considering the heterogeneity of physicochemical properties.
    Lambert S; Scherer C; Wagner M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 May; 13(3):470-475. PubMed ID: 28440923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.