These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36463075)

  • 1. Re: Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.
    Corrales M; Traxer O
    Eur Urol; 2023 Feb; 83(2):184-185. PubMed ID: 36463075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-79: The Thulium Fibre Laser in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Prospect and Risk Coexist?
    Li J; Huang Y; Cao D; Wei Q
    Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):e71. PubMed ID: 35715364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
    Kim HJ; Ghani KR
    Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e39-e40. PubMed ID: 35606231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
    Panthier F; Sierra A; Traxer O
    Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e35-e36. PubMed ID: 35527065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
    Yaghoubian AJ; Khusid JA; Gupta M
    Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e43-e44. PubMed ID: 35661627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Editorial Comment: Thulium fibre laser versus Holmium:YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial.
    Danilovic A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2023; 49(2):267-268. PubMed ID: 36825958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.
    Ulvik Ø; Æsøy MS; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C
    Eur Urol; 2022 Jul; 82(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 35300888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reply to Hyung Joon Kim and Khurshid R. Ghani's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
    Ulvik Ø; Sørstrand Æsøy M; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C
    Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e41-e42. PubMed ID: 35568598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reply to Frederic Panthier, Alba Sierra, and Olivier Traxer's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
    Ulvik Ø; Sørstrand Æsøy M; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C
    Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e37-e38. PubMed ID: 35551843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reply to Alan J. Yaghoubian, Jonathan A. Khusid, and Mantu Gupta's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
    Ulvik Ø; Sørstrand Æsøy M; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C
    Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e45-e46. PubMed ID: 35551844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reply to Jinze Li, Yin Huang, Dehong Cao, and Qiang Wei's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-79.
    Ulvik Ø; Sørstrand Æsøy M; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C
    Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):e72. PubMed ID: 35637042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tissue thermal effect during lithotripsy and tissue ablation in endourology: a systematic review of experimental studies comparing Holmium and Thulium lasers.
    Ortner G; Rice P; Nagele U; Herrmann TRW; Somani BK; Tokas T
    World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 36515722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SuperPulsed Thulium fiber laser: The ultimate laser for lithotripsy?
    Keller EX; Traxer O
    Arch Esp Urol; 2020 Oct; 73(8):767-776. PubMed ID: 33025921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG Laser vs the Thulium Fiber Laser for Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Haas CR; Knoedler MA; Li S; Gralnek DR; Best SL; Penniston KL; Nakada SY
    J Urol; 2023 Feb; 209(2):374-383. PubMed ID: 36621994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing Pediatric Ureteroscopy Outcomes with SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser and Low-Power Holmium:YAG Laser.
    Jaeger CD; Nelson CP; Cilento BG; Logvinenko T; Kurtz MP
    J Urol; 2022 Aug; 208(2):426-433. PubMed ID: 35703000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser.
    Petzold R; Miernik A; Suarez-Ibarrola R
    World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3651-3656. PubMed ID: 33758959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re.: Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs. high-power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG).
    Taratkin M; Herrmann TRW; Enikeev D
    World J Urol; 2022 May; 40(5):1259-1260. PubMed ID: 34686900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy.
    Andreeva V; Vinarov A; Yaroslavsky I; Kovalenko A; Vybornov A; Rapoport L; Enikeev D; Sorokin N; Dymov A; Tsarichenko D; Glybochko P; Fried N; Traxer O; Altshuler G; Gapontsev V
    World J Urol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):497-503. PubMed ID: 31055626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operating room noise hazards during laser lithotripsy: a comparison between the thulium fiber and holmium laser platforms.
    Moore J; Chavez A; Narang G; Bogle J; Stern K
    World J Urol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):801-805. PubMed ID: 35059787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super-pulse thulium fibre lasers.
    Ventimiglia E; Doizi S; Kovalenko A; Andreeva V; Traxer O
    BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):159-167. PubMed ID: 32277557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.