135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36463113)
1. Accuracy of axial length, keratometry, and refractive measurement with Myopia Master in children with ametropia.
Ye Y; Zhao Y; Han T; Zhang X; Miao H; Qin B; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):468. PubMed ID: 36463113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Three Different Devices for the Evaluation of Axial Length, Refractive Error, and Keratometry.
Hessler P; Künzel P; Degle S
Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Aug; 100(8):557-563. PubMed ID: 37097987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing ocular biometry and autorefraction measurements from the Myopia Master with the IOLMaster 700 and the Huvitz HRK-8000A autorefractor.
Pedersen HR; Svarverud E; Hagen LA; Gilson SJ; Baraas RC
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 May; 43(3):410-417. PubMed ID: 36734669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suitability of multifunction devices Myah and Myopia Master for monitoring myopia progression in children and adults.
Chow AHY; Mungalsingh MA; Thai D; Selimos Z; Yan SK; Xu H; Jones DA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jul; 44(5):1017-1030. PubMed ID: 38760986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relationships among cycloplegic refraction, keratometry, and axial length in children with refractive accommodative esotropia.
Khan AO
J AAPOS; 2011 Jun; 15(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 21665506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oculometry findings in high myopia at adult age: considerations based on oculometric follow-up data over 28 years in a cohort-based Danish high-myopia series.
Fledelius HC; Goldschmidt E
Acta Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 88(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 19416121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement between Pentacam and handheld Auto-Refractor/Keratometer for keratometry measurement.
Hashemi H; Heydarian S; Ali Yekta A; Aghamirsalim M; Ahmadi-Pishkuhi M; Valadkhan M; Ostadimoghaddam H; Amiri AA; Khabazkhoob M
J Optom; 2019; 12(4):232-239. PubMed ID: 31300242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Analysis of myopia and axial length changes and relevant factors of children aged 7 to 14 years in Wenzhou].
Zhang JY; Wang Q; Lin SS; Chen JW; Zhong HL; Ca DQ; Chen ZG
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 52(7):514-9. PubMed ID: 27531112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective Comparison of the Myopia Master and the Lenstar LS900 Axial Length Measurements in Children with Myopia.
Sivakumar T; Palmowski-Wolfe A
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2023 Apr; 240(4):587-590. PubMed ID: 37164410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship of axial length to cycloplegic refraction and keratometry in amblyopic eyes of hyperopic children.
Khan AO
J AAPOS; 2012 Feb; 16(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 22370665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of PlusOptix A09 distance refraction in pediatric myopia and hyperopia.
Payerols A; Eliaou C; Trezeguet V; Villain M; Daien V
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jun; 16():72. PubMed ID: 27246869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical 'dampening' of the refractive error to axial length ratio: implications for outcome measures in myopia control studies.
Cruickshank FE; Logan NS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):290-297. PubMed ID: 29691929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of age on measurement variability for axial length in myopic children.
Dang RM; Watt K; Kang P
Clin Exp Optom; 2024 May; 107(4):428-433. PubMed ID: 37674270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Baseline refractive and ocular component measures of children enrolled in the correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET).
Gwiazda J; Marsh-Tootle WL; Hyman L; Hussein M; Norton TT;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 43(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 11818372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcome between ANTERION and IOL Master 700.
Panda A; Nanda A; Sahoo K
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 70(5):1594-1598. PubMed ID: 35502033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of ocular axial length with optometric parameters is not accurate.
Galvis V; Tello A; Rey JJ; Serrano Gomez S; Prada AM
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2022 Jun; 45(3):101448. PubMed ID: 33975785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.
Hsieh YT; Wang IJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23147857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Axial length measurement using partial coherence interferometry in myopic children: repeatability of the measurement and comparison with refractive components.
Kimura S; Hasebe S; Miyata M; Hamasaki I; Ohtsuki H
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2007; 51(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 17401619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices.
Cho YJ; Lim TH; Choi KY; Cho BJ
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):257-264. PubMed ID: 30091303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of segmented measurement of axial length in ultra-high myopia filled with silicone oil using immersion B-scan ultrasonography.
Yang QH; Zhang HT; Li XQ; Chen B; Li ZH; Huang YF; Jin X; Zhang Y; Wang LQ
Int J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(5):793-799. PubMed ID: 35601170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
