These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36464816)

  • 1. PET/MR versus PET/CT for locoregional staging of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer.
    Flygare L; Erdogan ST; Söderkvist K
    Acta Radiol; 2023 May; 64(5):1865-1872. PubMed ID: 36464816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic performance of
    Chaput A; Robin P; Podeur F; Ollivier M; Keromnes N; Tissot V; Nonent M; Salaün PY; Rousset J; Abgral R
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Feb; 128(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 28600822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Locoregional tumour evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck area: a comparison between MRI, PET/CT and integrated PET/MRI.
    Schaarschmidt BM; Heusch P; Buchbender C; Ruhlmann M; Bergmann C; Ruhlmann V; Schlamann M; Antoch G; Forsting M; Wetter A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 26243264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Accuracy of
    Murtojärvi S; Malaspina S; Kinnunen I; Tuokkola T; Honka MJ; Saunavaara V; Tolvanen T; Schrey A; Kemppainen J
    Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2022; 2022():8676787. PubMed ID: 36082064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in the preoperative staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Roh JL; Yeo NK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Oral Oncol; 2007 Oct; 43(9):887-93. PubMed ID: 17207656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is there an additive value of 18 F-FDG PET-CT to CT/MRI for detecting nodal metastasis in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients with palpably negative neck?
    Sohn B; Koh YW; Kang WJ; Lee JH; Shin NY; Kim J
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1352-1359. PubMed ID: 26013025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Accuracy for IASLC/ITMIG Thymic Epithelial Tumor Staging Among Co-registered FDG-PET/MRI, Whole-body MRI, Integrated FDG-PET/CT, and Conventional Imaging Examination with and without Contrast Media Administrations.
    Ohno Y; Kishida Y; Seki S; Koyama H; Yui M; Aoyagi K; Yoshikawa T
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Mar; 29 Suppl 3():S122-S131. PubMed ID: 29395795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of FDG-PET/CT imaging on nodal staging for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Murakami R; Uozumi H; Hirai T; Nishimura R; Shiraishi S; Ota K; Murakami D; Tomiguchi S; Oya N; Katsuragawa S; Yamashita Y
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jun; 68(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 17321066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and
    Noij DP; Martens RM; Koopman T; Hoekstra OS; Comans EFI; Zwezerijnen B; de Bree R; de Graaf P; Castelijns JA
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2018 Dec; 30(12):780-792. PubMed ID: 30318343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with palpably negative neck.
    Ng SH; Yen TC; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Lee LY; Kang CJ; Wong AM; Liao CT
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4371-6. PubMed ID: 16983105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
    Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET/CT for initial N-staging of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Burian E; Palla B; Callahan N; Pyka T; Wolff C; von Schacky CE; Schmid A; Froelich MF; Rübenthaler J; Makowski MR; Gassert FG
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3870-3877. PubMed ID: 35606526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical utility of simultaneous whole-body
    Chan SC; Yeh CH; Yen TC; Ng SH; Chang JT; Lin CY; Yen-Ming T; Fan KH; Huang BS; Hsu CL; Chang KP; Wang HM; Liao CT
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(8):1297-1308. PubMed ID: 29502310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang C; Liang Z; Liu W; Zeng X; Mo Y
    BMC Cancer; 2023 Jan; 23(1):37. PubMed ID: 36624425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of prospective same-day 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma.
    Mistry V; Scott JR; Wang TY; Mollee P; Miles KA; Law WP; Hapgood G
    Cancer Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):11. PubMed ID: 36694244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Small Cell Lung Cancer Staging: Prospective Comparison of Conventional Staging Tests, FDG PET/CT, Whole-Body MRI, and Coregistered FDG PET/MRI.
    Ohno Y; Yoshikawa T; Takenaka D; Koyama H; Aoyagi K; Yui M; Oshima Y; Hamabuchi N; Tanaka Y; Shigemura C; Oota S; Nomura M; Murayama K; Inui Y; Kikukawa K; Toyama H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):899-908. PubMed ID: 34877872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value of retrospective image fusion of ¹⁸F-FDG PET and MRI for preoperative staging of head and neck cancer: comparison with PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck MRI.
    Kanda T; Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Konishi J; Sasaki R; Morimoto K; Saito M; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Sugimura K
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2005-10. PubMed ID: 23891295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiparametric functional MRI and
    Martens RM; Koopman T; Lavini C; Ali M; Peeters CFW; Noij DP; Zwezerijnen G; Marcus JT; Vergeer MR; Leemans CR; de Bree R; de Graaf P; Boellaard R; Castelijns JA
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):616-628. PubMed ID: 32851444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response evaluation of cervical lymph nodes after chemoradiation in patients with head and neck cancer - does additional [18F]FDG-PET-CT help?
    Dejaco D; Uprimny C; Widmann G; Riedl D; Moser P; Arnold C; Steinbichler TB; Kofler B; Schartinger VH; Virgolini I; Riechelmann H
    Cancer Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):69. PubMed ID: 32993805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Whole body MRI with Diffusion Weighted Imaging versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT in the staging of lymphomas.
    Maccioni F; Alfieri G; Assanto GM; Mattone M; Gentiloni Silveri G; Viola F; De Maio A; Frantellizzi V; Di Rocco A; De Vincentis G; Pulsoni A; Martelli M; Catalano C
    Radiol Med; 2023 May; 128(5):556-564. PubMed ID: 37145214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.