These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36465502)

  • 1. Consumer perceptions of QR code technology for enhanced fluid milk shelf-life information provision in a retail setting.
    Lau S; Wiedmann M; Adalja A
    JDS Commun; 2022 Nov; 3(6):393-397. PubMed ID: 36465502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the impact of providing digital product information on the health risks of alcoholic beverages to the consumer at point of sale: A pilot study.
    Rehm J; Ferreira-Borges C; Kokole D; Neufeld M; Olsen A; Rovira P; Segura Garcia L; Tran A; Colom J
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2023 Sep; 42(6):1332-1337. PubMed ID: 37132168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumer desires and perceptions of lactose-free milk.
    Rizzo PV; Harwood WS; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Aug; 103(8):6950-6966. PubMed ID: 32505391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumer willingness to pay for shelf life of high-temperature, short-time-pasteurized fluid milk: Implications for smart labeling and food waste reduction.
    Endara P; Wiedmann M; Adalja A
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Sep; 106(9):5940-5957. PubMed ID: 37474369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer understanding of fluid milk and cheese processing and composition.
    Schiano AN; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Aug; 104(8):8644-8660. PubMed ID: 34247744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic and environmental analysis of processing plant interventions to reduce fluid milk waste.
    Lau S; Wiedmann M; Adalja A
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Jul; 106(7):4773-4784. PubMed ID: 37268573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.
    Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What Intentions and Interesting Information Can Attract Consumers to Scan QR Code While Buying Eggs?
    Yang SH; Phan HTT; Hsieh CM; Li TN
    Foods; 2022 Apr; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35563982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of auctions to assess consumer value for fresh and end-of-code milk.
    Paterson M; Clark S
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 May; 103(5):4138-4150. PubMed ID: 32113779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumer purchase intention towards a quick response (QR) code for antibiotic information: an exploratory study.
    Bradford H; McKernan C; Elliott C; Dean M
    NPJ Sci Food; 2022 Apr; 6(1):23. PubMed ID: 35444188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk?
    McCarthy KS; Parker M; Ameerally A; Drake SL; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Aug; 100(8):6125-6138. PubMed ID: 28551193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Smoke and Scan: A Content Analysis of QR Code-Directed Websites Found on Cigarette Packs in China.
    Trimble DG; Welding K; Smith KC; Cohen JE
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):1912-1916. PubMed ID: 32447384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumer perception of the sustainability of dairy products and plant-based dairy alternatives.
    Schiano AN; Harwood WS; Gerard PD; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Dec; 103(12):11228-11243. PubMed ID: 33069414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 4SQR-Code: A 4-state QR code generation model for increasing data storing capacity in the Digital Twin framework.
    Udoy AI; Rahaman MA; Islam MJ; Rahman A; Ali Z; Muhammad G
    J Adv Res; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37858789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumer acceptance of a quick response (QR) code for the food traceability system: Application of an extended technology acceptance model (TAM).
    Kim YG; Woo E
    Food Res Int; 2016 Jul; 85():266-272. PubMed ID: 29544844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Balancing Freshness and Sustainability: Charting a Course for Meat Industry Innovation and Consumer Acceptance.
    Spada E; De Cianni R; Di Vita G; Mancuso T
    Foods; 2024 Apr; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 38611396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quick response code applications in medical and cardiology settings: a systematic scoping review.
    Faggiano A; Fioretti F; Nodari S; Carugo S
    Eur Heart J Digit Health; 2021 Jun; 2(2):336-341. PubMed ID: 37155668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing Consumer Preferences for Suboptimal Food: Application of a Choice Experiment in Citrus Fruit Retail.
    Huang WS; Kuo HY; Tung SY; Chen HS
    Foods; 2020 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 33374572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are the Innovative Electronic Labels for Extra Virgin Olive Oil Sustainable, Traceable, and Accepted by Consumers?
    Violino S; Pallottino F; Sperandio G; Figorilli S; Antonucci F; Ioannoni V; Fappiano D; Costa C
    Foods; 2019 Oct; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 31731433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shelf Life of Food Products: From Open Labeling to Real-Time Measurements.
    Corradini MG
    Annu Rev Food Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 9():251-269. PubMed ID: 29328810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.