181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36466009)
1. Psychometric Properties of the South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents in Chinese Adolescent Gamblers.
Zhou H; Chen JH; Ling H; Tong KK; Wu AMS
Int J Public Health; 2022; 67():1605182. PubMed ID: 36466009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The suitability of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) as a screening tool: IRT-based evidence.
Chiesi F; Donati MA; Galli S; Primi C
Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Mar; 27(1):287-93. PubMed ID: 23025708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Item Response Theory-Based Scoring of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised Adolescents.
Anselmi P; Colledani D; Andreotti A; Robusto E; Fabbris L; Vian P; Genetti B; Mortali C; Minutillo A; Mastrobattista L; Pacifici R
Assessment; 2022 Oct; 29(7):1381-1391. PubMed ID: 34036842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Italian Adolescent Gambling Behaviour: Psychometric Evaluation of the South Oaks Gambling Screen: Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) among a sample of Italian students.
Colasante E; Gori M; Bastiani L; Scalese M; Siciliano V; Molinaro S
J Gambl Stud; 2014 Dec; 30(4):789-801. PubMed ID: 23740346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assessment of the validity and reliability of the SOGS-RA.
Poulin C
J Gambl Stud; 2002; 18(1):67-93. PubMed ID: 12050848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) revisited: a cut-point analysis.
Boudreau B; Poulin C
J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 17180721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gambling problems among Lebanese adults: Arabic-Language version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) scale validation and correlates.
Haddad P; Roukoz R; Akel M; Hallit S
BMC Psychol; 2022 Feb; 10(1):18. PubMed ID: 35105378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An assessment of the psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of DSM-IV-MR-J and SOGS-RA.
Skokauskas N; Burba B; Freedman D
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19241149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: diagnosing and assessing pathological gambling in Turkey.
Duvarci I; Varan A; Coşkunol H; Ersoy MA
J Gambl Stud; 1997; 13(3):193-206. PubMed ID: 12913386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The SOGS-RA vs. the MAGS-7: prevalence estimates and classification congruence.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling J; Rohling ML; Rohde P; Seeley JR
J Gambl Stud; 2004; 20(3):259-81. PubMed ID: 15353924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concordance between the SOGS-RA and the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling among youth.
Ladouceur R; Ferland F; Poulin C; Vitaro F; Wiebe J
Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16187805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
Kido M; Shimazaki T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
Stinchfield R
Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the SOGS an accurate measure of pathological gambling among children, adolescents and adults?
Ladouceur R; Bouchard C; Rhéaume N; Jacques C; Ferland F; Leblond J; Walker M
J Gambl Stud; 2000; 16(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 14634319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence estimates of gambling participation and problem gambling among 16-18-year-old students in Iceland: a comparison of the SOGS-RA and DSM-IV-MR-J.
Olason DT; Sigurdardottir KJ; Smari J
J Gambl Stud; 2006; 22(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 16374661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A critical review of adolescent problem gambling assessment instruments.
Stinchfield R
Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2010; 22(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 20491419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA): further psychometric findings from a community sample.
Wiebe JM; Cox BJ; Mehmel BG
J Gambl Stud; 2000; 16(2-3):275-88. PubMed ID: 14634316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment.
Hardoon K; Derevensky JL; Gupta R
Addict Behav; 2003 Jul; 28(5):933-46. PubMed ID: 12788266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
