These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3646835)

  • 21. A total system of disposables.
    King DD
    Hospitals; 1971 Mar; 45(6):84 passim. PubMed ID: 5547687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ask tough questions before going outside. The third degree.
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1997 May; 6(5):48, 50. PubMed ID: 10167497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Guidelines for the reuse of disposable medical devices.
    J Sterile Serv Manage; 1986 Dec; 4(4):14. PubMed ID: 10280998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. VA examines disposables use; switch to reusables unlikely.
    Purch Adm; 1980 Oct; 4(9):58. PubMed ID: 10248302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reprocessors threatened. Bill could complicate reconditioning single-use devices.
    Becker C
    Mod Healthc; 2002 May; 32(20):22. PubMed ID: 12048837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Risky recycling: that "disposable" catheter may have been used before.
    Hawkins D
    US News World Rep; 1999 Sep; 127(11):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 10621509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reuse of single-use devices. A program model.
    Reichert M
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1993 Sep; 28(3):697-709. PubMed ID: 8367334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modern central service: more trials mean less error in ordering disposables.
    Christie JE; Ginsberg F
    Mod Hosp; 1967 Oct; 109(4):126. PubMed ID: 6065192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A look at disposables.
    Golden DL
    Hospitals; 1970 Mar; 44(5):68 passim. PubMed ID: 5414580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Errors in handling can make sterile disposables unsafe.
    Ginsberg F; Clarke B
    Mod Hosp; 1971 Oct; 117(4):156-8. PubMed ID: 5122887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laparoscopic instruments good outsourcing candidates.
    Whittington S; Vasey N
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1997 Jun; 22(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10173016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Follow expert insight to launch a successful reprocessing program.
    Hosp Mater Manage; 2008 Mar; 33(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 18459702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examining liability risks in disposable reuse.
    OR Manager; 1996 Jun; 12(6):10, 16. PubMed ID: 10157851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Survey reveals that some providers reuse needles.
    RN; 2003 Jan; 66(1):14. PubMed ID: 12616750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Are your disposables safe?
    Bruch CW
    Hospitals; 1971 Sep; 45(17):138-46. PubMed ID: 5571529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Disposables: a success story.
    Campbell I
    Hosp Adm Can; 1977 Sep; 19(9):40, 42. PubMed ID: 10308904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aseptic management of disposables.
    Burgess RE
    Hosp Top; 1970 Jan; 48(1):95-8 passim. PubMed ID: 5414573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Survey: ORs are split on reuse of single-use items.
    OR Manager; 1999 Sep; 15(9):1, 11, 14-6. PubMed ID: 10621461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A tale of two markets: predicting the future of medical disposables.
    Med Device Technol; 1998 Oct; 9(8):18. PubMed ID: 10186987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs.
    Hickey M; Fields M
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.