These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36468394)
1. Bioethics and Civic Education in a Post- Lanphier E Perspect Biol Med; 2022; 65(4):654-663. PubMed ID: 36468394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health. Harrison LK; Naylor KL Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right. Benshoof J Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning Paltrow LM; Harris LH; Marshall MF Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):3-15. PubMed ID: 35652910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Critical Analysis of Manninen BA Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):357-367. PubMed ID: 36647699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. June, bioethics and the Supreme Court. Gardell MA J Med Philos; 1986 Aug; 11(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 3794559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond. Martin PA Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade. Mcfarlane DR Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The state of abortion rights in the US. Davis MF Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Managing Undesired Pregnancy After Dobbs. Casas RS; Horvath SK; Schwarz EB; Bachorik AE; Chuang CC J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Dec; 37(16):4272-4275. PubMed ID: 36220947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals. Benshoof J Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion. Macklin R Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bioethics, public policy, and political science. Carmen IH Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 11654822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs. Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The bioethics of human fetal tissue research and therapy: moral decision making of professionals. Cefalo RC; Berghmans RL; Hall SP Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):12-9. PubMed ID: 8296813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade. Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Post-Roe Political Landscape Demands a Morality of Caution for Women's Health. Goodday S; Karlin D; Suver C; Friend S J Med Internet Res; 2022 Oct; 24(10):e41417. PubMed ID: 36264611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Yes, All Bioethicists Should Engage Abortion Ethics, but Who Would Be Interested in What They Have to Say? Nobis N Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):33-36. PubMed ID: 35917432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]