These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36469224)
1. Bayesian multidimensional nominal response model for observer study of radiologists. Nishio M; Kobayashi D; Matsuo H; Urase Y; Nishioka E; Murakami T Jpn J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 41(4):449-455. PubMed ID: 36469224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian Statistical Model of Item Response Theory in Observer Studies of Radiologists. Nishio M; Akasaka T; Sakamoto R; Togashi K Acad Radiol; 2020 Mar; 27(3):e45-e54. PubMed ID: 31147237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian Dimensionality Assessment for the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model. Revuelta J; Ximénez C Front Psychol; 2017; 8():961. PubMed ID: 28670291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using the Stan Program for Bayesian Item Response Theory. Luo Y; Jiao H Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Jun; 78(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 30140099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Restricted Latent Class Models for Nominal Response Data: Identifiability and Estimation. Liu Y; Culpepper SA Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):592-625. PubMed ID: 38114767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Seven-parameter Diffusion Model: an Implementation in Stan for Bayesian Analyses. Henrich F; Hartmann R; Pratz V; Voss A; Klauer KC Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3102-3116. PubMed ID: 37640960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Stan tutorial on Bayesian IRTree models: Conventional models and explanatory extension. Xue M; Chen Y Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1817-1837. PubMed ID: 37095325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nominal Factor Analysis of Situational Judgment Tests: Evaluation of Latent Dimensionality and Factorial Invariance. Revuelta J; Franco-Martínez A; Ximénez C Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Dec; 81(6):1054-1088. PubMed ID: 34565816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Latent variable sdelection in multidimensional item response theory models using the expectation model selection algorithm. Xu PF; Shang L; Zheng QZ; Shan N; Tang ML Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 May; 75(2):363-394. PubMed ID: 34918834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of unweighted and item response theory-based weighted sum scoring for the Nine-Questions Depression-Rating Scale in the Northern Thai Dialect. Kawilapat S; Maneeton B; Maneeton N; Prasitwattanaseree S; Kongsuk T; Arunpongpaisal S; Leejongpermpoon J; Sukhawaha S; Traisathit P BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Oct; 22(1):268. PubMed ID: 36224520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Probabilistic Model to Support Radiologists' Classification Decisions in Mammography Practice. Zeng J; Gimenez F; Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Shachter R Med Decis Making; 2019 Apr; 39(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30819048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnose Like a Radiologist: Hybrid Neuro-Probabilistic Reasoning for Attribute-Based Medical Image Diagnosis. Zhao G; Feng Q; Chen C; Zhou Z; Yu Y IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2022 Nov; 44(11):7400-7416. PubMed ID: 34822325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Explanatory Multidimensional Random Item Effects Rating Scale Model. Huang S; Luo JJ; Cai L Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Dec; 83(6):1229-1248. PubMed ID: 37974656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advancing the Bayesian Approach for Multidimensional Polytomous and Nominal IRT Models: Model Formulations and Fit Measures. Chen J Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 41(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 29881075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring Bayesian Approaches to eQTL Mapping Through Probabilistic Programming. Vavoulis DV Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2082():123-146. PubMed ID: 31849012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian inference with Stan: A tutorial on adding custom distributions. Annis J; Miller BJ; Palmeri TJ Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):863-886. PubMed ID: 27287444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving psychometric assessment of the Beck Depression Inventory using multidimensional item response theory. Fragoso TM; Cúri M Biom J; 2013 Jul; 55(4):527-40. PubMed ID: 23526351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The performance of digital chest radiographs in the detection and diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and the consistency among readers]. Liang M; Zhao SJ; Zhou LN; Xu XJ; Wang YW; Niu L; Wang HH; Tang W; Wu N Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Mar; 45(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 36944548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimum perceivable size difference: how well can radiologists visually detect a change in lung nodule size from CT images? Solomon J; Ebner L; Christe A; Peters A; Munz J; Löbelenz L; Klaus J; Richards T; Samei E; Roos JE Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 32997175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Investigation into the Consistency in Mammographic Density Identification by Radiologists: Effect of Radiologist Expertise and Mammographic Appearance. Li Y; Brennan PC; Lee W; Nickson C; Pietrzyk MW; Ryan EA J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 26259522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]