These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36469436)

  • 1. Does hoodwinking others pay? The psychological and relational consequences of undetected negotiator deception.
    Van Zant AB; Kennedy JA; Kray LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 May; 124(5):1001-1024. PubMed ID: 36469436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interpersonal costs of dishonesty: How dishonest behavior reduces individuals' ability to read others' emotions.
    Lee JJ; Hardin AE; Parmar B; Gino F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1557-1574. PubMed ID: 31305092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the relative importance of individual-level characteristics and dyadic interaction effects in negotiations: Variance partitioning evidence from a twins study.
    Elfenbein HA; Eisenkraft N; Curhan JR; DiLalla LF
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Jan; 103(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 28805427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negotiators' bargaining histories and their effects on future negotiation performance.
    O'connor KM; Arnold JA; Burris ER
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):350-62. PubMed ID: 15769243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negotiators' profit predicted by cognitive reappraisal, suppression of emotions, misrepresentation of information, and tolerance of ambiguity.
    Yurtsever G
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Apr; 106(2):590-608. PubMed ID: 18556912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collaborative dishonesty: A meta-analytic review.
    Leib M; Köbis N; Soraperra I; Weisel O; Shalvi S
    Psychol Bull; 2021 Dec; 147(12):1241-1268. PubMed ID: 35404634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When is straightforwardness a liability in negotiations? The role of integrative potential and structural power.
    Derue DS; Conlon DE; Moon H; Willaby HW
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1032-47. PubMed ID: 19594242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaginary alternatives: The effects of mental simulation on powerless negotiators.
    Schaerer M; Schweinsberg M; Swaab RI
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jul; 115(1):96-117. PubMed ID: 29595292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insincere negotiations: How negotiators can misrepresent their objectives to exploit counterparts during and after negotiations.
    Kang P
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Oct; 47():101409. PubMed ID: 36037737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face threat sensitivity in distributive negotiations: Effects on negotiator self-esteem and demands.
    Tuncel E; Kong DT; McLean Parks J; van Kleef GA
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2020 Nov; 161():255-273. PubMed ID: 32958980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotions and ethics: How emotions sensitize perceptions of the consequences for self and others to motivate unethical behavior.
    Yip JA; Lee KK
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Dec; 48():101464. PubMed ID: 36244308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Too much information: the perils of nondiagnostic information in negotiations.
    Wiltermuth SS; Neale MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 21244131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artful paltering: The risks and rewards of using truthful statements to mislead others.
    Rogers T; Zeckhauser R; Gino F; Norton MI; Schweitzer ME
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Mar; 112(3):456-473. PubMed ID: 27936834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategic consequences of emotional misrepresentation in negotiation: The blowback effect.
    Campagna RL; Mislin AA; Kong DT; Bottom WP
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 May; 101(5):605-24. PubMed ID: 26653531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "False positive" emotions, responsibility, and moral character.
    Anderson RA; Kamtekar R; Nichols S; Pizarro DA
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104770. PubMed ID: 34023670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit negotiation beliefs and performance: experimental and longitudinal evidence.
    Kray LJ; Haselhuhn MP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Jul; 93(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 17605588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dynamics of gender and alternatives in negotiation.
    Dannals JE; Zlatev JJ; Halevy N; Neale MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2021 Nov; 106(11):1655-1672. PubMed ID: 33411548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guilt underlies compassion among those who have suffered adversity.
    Lim D; DeSteno D
    Emotion; 2023 Apr; 23(3):613-621. PubMed ID: 35951385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anger as a trigger for information search in integrative negotiations.
    Rees L; Chi SS; Friedman R; Shih HL
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Jul; 105(7):713-731. PubMed ID: 31697114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. People respond with different moral emotions to violations in different relational models: A cross-cultural comparison.
    Sunar D; Cesur S; Piyale ZE; Tepe B; Biten AF; Hill CT; Koç Y
    Emotion; 2021 Jun; 21(4):693-706. PubMed ID: 32191085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.