These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36469985)

  • 1. Meat the challenge: Segmentation and profiling of Japanese beef mince and its substitutes consumers.
    Washio T; Saijo M; Ito H; Takeda KI; Ohashi T
    Meat Sci; 2023 Mar; 197():109047. PubMed ID: 36469985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?
    Sonoda Y; Oishi K; Chomei Y; Hirooka H
    Meat Sci; 2018 Dec; 146():75-86. PubMed ID: 30103081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diversity of Japanese consumers' requirements, sensory perceptions, and eating preferences for meat.
    Sasaki K
    Anim Sci J; 2022; 93(1):e13705. PubMed ID: 35266248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Would You Buy Plant-Based Beef Patties? A Survey on Product Attribute Preference and Willingness to Pay among Consumers in Liaoning Province, China.
    Zhou M; Guan B; Huang L
    Nutrients; 2022 Oct; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36297077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification and characterization of Japanese consumers' beef preferences by external preference mapping.
    Sasaki K; Ooi M; Nagura N; Motoyama M; Narita T; Oe M; Nakajima I; Hagi T; Ojima K; Kobayashi M; Nomura M; Muroya S; Hayashi T; Akama K; Fujikawa A; Hokiyama H; Kobayashi K; Nishimura T
    J Sci Food Agric; 2017 Aug; 97(10):3453-3462. PubMed ID: 28071797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emerging markets for imported beef in China: Results from a consumer choice experiment in Beijing.
    Ortega DL; Hong SJ; Wang HH; Wu L
    Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():317-323. PubMed ID: 27395825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes.
    Merlino VM; Borra D; Girgenti V; Dal Vecchio A; Massaglia S
    Meat Sci; 2018 Sep; 143():119-128. PubMed ID: 29738962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spanish, French and British consumers' acceptability of Uruguayan beef, and consumers' beef choice associated with country of origin, finishing diet and meat price.
    Realini CE; Font i Furnols M; Sañudo C; Montossi F; Oliver MA; Guerrero L
    Meat Sci; 2013 Sep; 95(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 23644048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of the Food Labeling and Other Factors on Consumer Preferences Using Discrete Choice Modeling-The Example of Traditional Pork Sausage.
    Czine P; Török Á; Pető K; Horváth P; Balogh P
    Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Beef choice.
    Ngapo TM; Braña Varela D; Rubio Lozano MS
    Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():34-43. PubMed ID: 28750333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the role of information and taste heterogeneity in consumer preferences for functional beef: The case of the omega-3 enriched burger.
    Boncinelli F; Piracci G; Casini L
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108614. PubMed ID: 34229235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
    Ardeshiri A; Sampson S; Swait J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumer perception of health properties and of other attributes of beef as determinants of consumption and purchase decisions.
    Gutkowska K; Czarnecki J; Głąbska D; Guzek D; Batóg A
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2018; 69(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 30525333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis.
    Meyerding SGH; Gentz M; Altmann B; Meier-Dinkel L
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of information on beef husbandry systems on consumers' preferences and willingness to pay.
    Risius A; Hamm U
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():9-14. PubMed ID: 27792916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where's the beef? Retail channel choice and beef preferences in Argentina.
    Colella F; Ortega DL
    Meat Sci; 2017 Nov; 133():86-94. PubMed ID: 28662454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Consumers in the UK and Spain Value the Coexistence of the Claims Low Fat, Local, Organic and Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
    Akaichi F; Revoredo Giha C; Glenk K; Gil JM
    Nutrients; 2020 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers.
    Slade P
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():428-437. PubMed ID: 29501683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing consumers' preferences for beef and lamb meat linked to wildfire prevention services.
    Lecegui A; Olaizola AM; Varela E
    Meat Sci; 2023 Dec; 206():109346. PubMed ID: 37741031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.