157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36470716)
41. Structural analysis of customized 3D printed plate for pelvic bone by comparison with conventional plate based on bending process.
Jo WL; Chung YG; Shin SH; Lim JH; Kim MS; Yoon DK
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10542. PubMed ID: 37386116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Three-Dimensional Multimodality Image Reconstruction as Teaching Tool for Case-based learning among medical postgraduates: a focus on primary pelvic bone Tumour Education.
Hu X; Wang Y; Li J; Qing P; Yang X; Zeng J; Min L; Tu C
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Dec; 23(1):944. PubMed ID: 38087270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Conventional plate fixation method versus pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing-assisted contoured plate fixation method in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture.
Hung CC; Li YT; Chou YC; Chen JE; Wu CC; Shen HC; Yeh TT
Int Orthop; 2019 Feb; 43(2):425-431. PubMed ID: 29725736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Two-Stage Structure-Focused Contrastive Learning for Automatic Identification and Localization of Complex Pelvic Fractures.
Zeng B; Wang H; Xu J; Tu P; Joskowicz L; Chen X
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2023 Sep; 42(9):2751-2762. PubMed ID: 37030821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Surgical treatment for both-column acetabular fractures using pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing techniques.
Huang JH; Liao H; Tan XY; Xing WR; Zhou Q; Zheng YS; Cao HY; Zeng CJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2020 Feb; 133(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 31977558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A novel approach using 3-D printing in the Irish National Centre for pelvic and acetabular surgery.
Downey C; McCarrick C; Fenelon C; Murphy EP; O'Daly BJ; Leonard M
Ir J Med Sci; 2020 Feb; 189(1):219-228. PubMed ID: 31280418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Utility of 3D printed models as adjunct in acetabular fracture teaching for Orthopaedic trainees.
Goyal S; Chua C; Chen YS; Murphy D; O 'Neill GK
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Aug; 22(1):595. PubMed ID: 35918716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Classification of pelvic fractures: analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability using the Young-Burgess and Tile classification systems.
Furey AJ; O'Toole RV; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Copeland CE; Turen C
Orthopedics; 2009 Jun; 32(6):401. PubMed ID: 19634829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Value of 3-D CT in classifying acetabular fractures during orthopedic residency training.
Garrett J; Halvorson J; Carroll E; Webb LX
Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e615-20. PubMed ID: 22588400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. 3D printing method for next-day acetabular fracture surgery using a surface filtering pipeline: feasibility and 1-year clinical results.
Weidert S; Andress S; Linhart C; Suero EM; Greiner A; Böcker W; Kammerlander C; Becker CA
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Mar; 15(3):565-575. PubMed ID: 31897965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Development of a three-dimensional printed heart from computed tomography images of a plastinated specimen for learning anatomy.
Radzi S; Tan HKJ; Tan GJS; Yeong WY; Ferenczi MA; Low-Beer N; Mogali SR
Anat Cell Biol; 2020 Mar; 53(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 32274249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The intra- and interobserver reliability of the Tile AO, the Young and Burgess, and FFP classifications in pelvic trauma.
Berger-Groch J; Thiesen DM; Grossterlinden LG; Schaewel J; Fensky F; Hartel MJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 May; 139(5):645-650. PubMed ID: 30715568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Adapting anatomy teaching to surgical trends: a combination of classical dissection, medical imaging, and 3D-printing technologies.
Fasel JH; Aguiar D; Kiss-Bodolay D; Montet X; Kalangos A; Stimec BV; Ratib O
Surg Radiol Anat; 2016 Apr; 38(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 26553051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54.
Cercenelli L; De Stefano A; Billi AM; Ruggeri A; Marcelli E; Marchetti C; Manzoli L; Ratti S; Badiali G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Impact of a three-dimensional "hands-on" anatomic teaching module on acetabular fracture pattern recognition by orthopaedic residents.
Hansen E; Marmor M; Matityahu A
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):e1771-7. PubMed ID: 23224397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Three-Dimensional Printing in Medical and Allied Health Practice: A Literature Review.
Spencer SR; Kay Watts L
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 51(3):489-500. PubMed ID: 32620524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The effect of an infra-acetabular screw for anatomically shaped three-dimensional plate or standard plate designs in acetabulum fractures: a biomechanical analysis.
Graul I; Marintschev I; Pizanis A; Herath SC; Pohlemann T; Fritz T
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2022 Oct; 48(5):3757-3764. PubMed ID: 34618166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Do 3-D Printed Handheld Models Improve Surgeon Reliability for Recognition of Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture Characteristics?
Langerhuizen DWG; Doornberg JN; Janssen MMA; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; Jaarsma RL; Janssen SJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 478(12):2901-2908. PubMed ID: 32667759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Using three-dimensional printed models for trainee orbital fracture education.
Rama M; Schlegel L; Wisner D; Pugliese R; Ramesh S; Penne R; Watson A
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Jun; 23(1):467. PubMed ID: 37349755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Imaging diagnose and clinical meaning for easy neglect occult posterior pelvic ring injury].
Li M; Xu RM; Zheng Q; Xiao BP; Wang GP
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Nov; 21(11):810-3. PubMed ID: 19143238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
