These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36470965)

  • 1. Item format statistics and readability of extended matching questions as an effective tool to assess medical students.
    Frey A; Leutritz T; Backhaus J; Hörnlein A; König S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):20982. PubMed ID: 36470965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating a bedside tool for neuroanatomical localization with extended-matching questions.
    Tan K; Chin HX; Yau CWL; Lim ECH; Samarasekera D; Ponnamperuma G; Tan NCK
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 28941011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postexamination item analysis of undergraduate pediatric multiple-choice questions exam: implications for developing a validated question Bank.
    Rashwan NI; Aref SR; Nayel OA; Rizk MH
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 24(1):168. PubMed ID: 38383427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing a script concordance examination to a multiple-choice examination on a core internal medicine clerkship.
    Kelly W; Durning S; Denton G
    Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 22775780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple choice questions are superior to extended matching questions to identify medicine and biomedical sciences students who perform poorly.
    Eijsvogels TMH; van den Brand TL; Hopman MTE
    Perspect Med Educ; 2013 Nov; 2(5-6):252-263. PubMed ID: 24203858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between MCQ, Extended matching questions (EMQ) and Script concordance test (SCT) for assessment among first-year medical students - A pilot study.
    Nalini YC; Manivasakan S; Pai DR
    J Educ Health Promot; 2024; 13():52. PubMed ID: 38549656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of clinical-scenario (case cluster) versus stand-alone multiple choice questions in a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate medicine.
    Vuma S; Sa B
    J Taibah Univ Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 31435208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of English Language on Multiple Choice Question Scores of Thai Medical Students.
    Phisalprapa P; Muangkaew W; Assanasen J; Kunavisarut T; Thongngarm T; Ruchutrakool T; Kobwanthanakun S; Dejsomritrutai W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Apr; 99(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 27396231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
    Mahmood H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.
    Vegada B; Shukla A; Khilnani A; Charan J; Desai C
    Indian J Pharmacol; 2016; 48(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 27721545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Modified Essay Questions (MEQ) and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) as a tool for Assessing the Cognitive Skills of Undergraduate Medical Students.
    Khan MU; Aljarallah BM
    Int J Health Sci (Qassim); 2011 Jan; 5(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 22489228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity and reliability of the sixth-year internal medical examination administered at the King Abdulaziz University Medical College.
    Fallatah HI; Tekian A; Park YS; Al Shawa L
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Feb; 15():10. PubMed ID: 25638149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical education.
    Bhakta B; Tennant A; Horton M; Lawton G; Andrich D
    BMC Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 5(1):9. PubMed ID: 15752421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychometric characteristics and response times for content-parallel extended-matching and one-best-answer items in relation to number of options.
    Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Allbee K; Clauser BE
    Acad Med; 2006 Oct; 81(10 Suppl):S52-5. PubMed ID: 17001136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence.
    Norcini JJ; Swanson DB; Grosso LJ; Webster GD
    Med Educ; 1985 May; 19(3):238-47. PubMed ID: 4010571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of medical students in radiology. Written testing using uncued multiple-choice questions.
    Fajardo LL; Chan KM
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Oct; 28(10):964-8. PubMed ID: 8262753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A psychometric evaluation of the anatomy learning experiences questionnaire and correlations with learning outcomes.
    Choi-Lundberg DL; Williams AM; Zimitat C
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):514-527. PubMed ID: 28423232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An experimental comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions on a high-stakes test for medical students.
    Mee J; Pandian R; Wolczynski J; Morales A; Paniagua M; Harik P; Baldwin P; Clauser BE
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):783-801. PubMed ID: 37665413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors underlying performance on written tests of knowledge.
    Norman GR; Smith EK; Powles AC; Rooney PJ; Henry NL; Dodd PE
    Med Educ; 1987 Jul; 21(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 3626897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are script concordance tests suitable for the assessment of undergraduate students? A multicenter comparative study.
    Cohen Aubart F; Papo T; Hertig A; Renaud MC; Steichen O; Amoura Z; Braun M; Palombi O; Duguet A; Roux D
    Rev Med Interne; 2021 Apr; 42(4):243-250. PubMed ID: 33288231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.