These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36470965)

  • 21. Validation of the 5-item doctor-patient communication competency instrument for medical students (DPCC-MS) using two years of assessment data.
    Renaud JS; Côté L
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Oct; 17(1):189. PubMed ID: 29073899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?
    Wass V; McGibbon D; Van der Vleuten C
    Med Educ; 2001 Apr; 35(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 11318994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?
    Hift RJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():249. PubMed ID: 25431359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How do students with dyslexia perform in extended matching questions, short answer questions and observed structured clinical examinations?
    Gibson S; Leinster S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 Aug; 16(3):395-404. PubMed ID: 21249518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiple-choice testing in anatomy.
    Nnodim JO
    Med Educ; 1992 Jul; 26(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 1630332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. OSCE as a tool for evaluation of practical semiology in comparison to MCQ & oral examination.
    Dadgar SR; Saleh A; Bahador H; Baradaran HR
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2008 Sep; 58(9):506-7. PubMed ID: 18846801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Utility of a multimodal computer-based assessment format for assessment with a higher degree of reliability and validity.
    Renes J; van der Vleuten CPM; Collares CF
    Med Teach; 2023 Apr; 45(4):433-441. PubMed ID: 36306368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Small group learning: effect on item analysis and accuracy of self-assessment of medical students.
    Biswas SS; Jain V; Agrawal V; Bindra M
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 26261109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of Multifaceted Assessment of the Fifth-Year Medical Students in Family Medicine Clerkship, Saudi Arabia Experience.
    AlShamlan NA; Al Shammari MA; Darwish MA; Sebiany AM; Sabra AA; Alalmaie SM
    J Multidiscip Healthc; 2020; 13():321-328. PubMed ID: 32256080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The introduction of single best answer questions as a test of knowledge in the final examination for the fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists in Clinical Oncology.
    Tan LT; McAleer JJ;
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Oct; 20(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 18585017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. It takes only 100 true-false items to test medical students: true or false?
    Pamphlett R
    Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 16147803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Testing of medical students with open-ended, uncued questions.
    Damjanov I; Fenderson BA; Veloski JJ; Rubin E
    Hum Pathol; 1995 Apr; 26(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 7705813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Transposition of an American-designed comprehensive medical student examination within the framework of the forthcoming French nationwide comprehensive examination. A preliminary study].
    Fournier JP; De Champlain AF; Benchimol D; Staccini P; Subhiyah R; Braun M; Kohler C; Guidet B; Claudepierre P; Prevel M; Scoles P; Holtzman K; Swanson D; Angelucci K; McGrenra C; Goldberg J; Rampal P; Melnick D
    Ann Med Interne (Paris); 2003 May; 154(3):148-56. PubMed ID: 12910041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?
    Pham H; Trigg M; Wu S; O'Connell A; Harry C; Barnard J; Devitt P
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2018; 31(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 30531047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.
    Kurtz JB; Lourie MA; Holman EE; Grob KL; Monrad SU
    Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1630239. PubMed ID: 31248355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Added value of assessing medical students' reflective writings in communication skills training: a longitudinal study in four academic centres.
    Ament Giuliani Franco C; Franco RS; Cecilio-Fernandes D; Severo M; Ferreira MA; de Carvalho-Filho MA
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e038898. PubMed ID: 33158823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A modified electronic key feature examination for undergraduate medical students: validation threats and opportunities.
    Fischer MR; Kopp V; Holzer M; Ruderich F; Jünger J
    Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):450-5. PubMed ID: 16147800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions at the Department of Paediatrics, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
    Kheyami D; Jaradat A; Al-Shibani T; Ali FA
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2018 Feb; 18(1):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 29666684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.