These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36472481)

  • 41. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.
    Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Posterior composites: Update on cavities and filling techniques.
    Sabbagh J; McConnell RJ; McConnell MC
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():86-90. PubMed ID: 27889605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Teaching of composite restoration repair in Brazilian dental schools.
    Girotto LPDS; Chisini LA; Lynch CD; Blum IR; Wilson NH; Sarkis-Onofre R; Carvalho RV; van de Sande FH
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104410. PubMed ID: 36626975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fracture resistance of defective amalgam restorations repaired with a resin-based composite material.
    Hopkins CE; Restrepo-Kennedy N; Elgreatly A; Comnick C; Vargas M; Teixeira EC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2023 Feb; 154(2):141-150. PubMed ID: 36543651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical longevity of extensive direct resin composite restorations after amalgam replacement with a mean follow-up of 15 years.
    Hofsteenge JW; Scholtanus JD; Özcan M; Nolte IM; Cune MS; Gresnigt MMM
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104409. PubMed ID: 36623686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Variations in survival time for amalgam and resin composite restorations: a population based cohort analysis.
    Birch S; Price R; Andreou P; Jones G; Portolesi A
    Community Dent Health; 2016 Sep; 33(3):208-212. PubMed ID: 28509516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis.
    Heintze SD; Rousson V
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):407-31. PubMed ID: 23082310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Soncini JA; Maserejian NN; Trachtenberg F; Tavares M; Hayes C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 17545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Teaching of the repair of defective composite restorations in Middle Eastern and North African Dental Schools.
    Nassar M; Al-Fakhri O; Shabbir N; Islam MS; Gordan VV; Lynch CD; Wilson NH; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103753. PubMed ID: 34339798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Teaching of posterior composites in dental schools in Japan.
    Hayashi M; Seow LL; Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Apr; 36(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 19220718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania.
    Brunton PA; Ghazali A; Tarif ZH; Loch C; Lynch C; Wilson N; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():62-67. PubMed ID: 28232082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Composite veneering of complex amalgam restorations.
    Demarco FF; Zanchi CH; Bueno M; Piva E
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 17288335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
    Bernardo M; Luis H; Martin MD; Leroux BG; Rue T; Leitão J; DeRouen TA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 17545266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Amalgam Phase-Down Part 1: UK-Based Posterior Restorative Material and Technique Use.
    Bailey O; Vernazza CR; Stone S; Ternent L; Roche AG; Lynch C
    JDR Clin Trans Res; 2022 Jan; 7(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 33300416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Teaching students the repair of resin-based composite restorations: a survey of North American dental schools.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Blum IR; Wilson N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 134(3):317-23; quiz 338-9. PubMed ID: 12699045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.