These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36472481)

  • 61. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations.
    Leinfelder KF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jun; 127(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 8708275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Amalgam vs. composite resin: 1998.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Dec; 129(12):1757-9. PubMed ID: 9854929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
    Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 1840079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Agreement Among Dental Students, Peer Assessors, and Tutor in Assessing Students' Competence in Preclinical Skills.
    Foley JI; Richardson GL; Drummie J
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1320-4. PubMed ID: 26522637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Trends in material choice for direct restorations by final year students from University College Cork 2004-2009.
    O'Sullivan CO; McKenna GJ; Burke FM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 22474934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The teaching of posterior resin composites: planning for the future based on 25 years of research.
    Wilson NH; Lynch CD
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):503-16. PubMed ID: 24582692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The Dental Amalgam Phasedown in New Zealand: A 20-year Trend.
    Broadbent JM; Murray CM; Schwass DR; Brosnan M; Brunton PA; Lyons KS; Thomson WM
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(3):255-264. PubMed ID: 31995425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.
    Alkhudhairy F
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Nov; 9(1):488. PubMed ID: 27855718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Early failure of Class II resin composite versus Class II amalgam restorations placed by dental students.
    Overton JD; Sullivan DJ
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 22383602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations in student clinics in Manchester and Athens.
    Deligeorgi V; Wilson NH; Fouzas D; Kouklaki E; Burke FJ; Mjör IA
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2000 Nov; 4(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 11168480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins.
    Fukushima M; Setcos JC; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 3066806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Teaching of posterior composites in dental schools in Japan - 30 years and beyond.
    Hayashi M; Yamada T; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF
    J Dent; 2018 Sep; 76():19-23. PubMed ID: 29474951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer-lined amalgam and composite restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogianis Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Aug; 23(8):511-9. PubMed ID: 8866262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Smith CD; Williams JE; Sherrer JD; Mackert JR; Richards EE; Schuster GS; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Kovarik RE
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Dec; 23(12):827-38. PubMed ID: 1305301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.