These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36472867)

  • 1. Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (< 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer.
    Wang D; Cao L; Li B
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2022; 141(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 36472867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of the cloud-based computerized interpretation system in a nationwide lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: comparison with the conventional reading system.
    Hwang EJ; Goo JM; Kim HY; Yi J; Yoon SH; Kim Y
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):475-485. PubMed ID: 32797309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided detection (CAD) of solid pulmonary nodules in chest x-ray equivalent ultralow dose chest CT - first in-vivo results at dose levels of 0.13mSv.
    Messerli M; Kluckert T; Knitel M; Rengier F; Warschkow R; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Wildermuth S; Bauer RW
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2217-2224. PubMed ID: 27842670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of Subsolid Nodules in Lung Cancer Screening: Complementary Sensitivity of Visual Reading and Computer-Aided Diagnosis.
    Silva M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Jacobs C; Capretti G; Ciompi F; van Ginneken B; Pastorino U; Sverzellati N
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Aug; 53(8):441-449. PubMed ID: 29543693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum-Intensity-Projection and Computer-Aided-Detection Algorithms as Stand-Alone Reader Devices in Lung Cancer Screening Using Different Dose Levels and Reconstruction Kernels.
    Ebner L; Roos JE; Christensen JD; Dobrocky T; Leidolt L; Brela B; Obmann VC; Joy S; Huber A; Christe A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Aug; 207(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 27249174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. JOURNAL CLUB: Computer-Aided Detection of Lung Nodules on CT With a Computerized Pulmonary Vessel Suppressed Function.
    Lo SB; Freedman MT; Gillis LB; White CS; Mun SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):480-488. PubMed ID: 29336601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cloud-based computer-aided detection system improves identification of lung nodules on computed tomography scans of patients with extra-thoracic malignancies.
    Vassallo L; Traverso A; Agnello M; Bracco C; Campanella D; Chiara G; Fantacci ME; Lopez Torres E; Manca A; Saletta M; Giannini V; Mazzetti S; Stasi M; Cerello P; Regge D
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 29948089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a deep learning computer aided system for CT based lung nodule detection, classification, and growth rate estimation in a routine clinical population.
    Murchison JT; Ritchie G; Senyszak D; Nijwening JH; van Veenendaal G; Wakkie J; van Beek EJR
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0266799. PubMed ID: 35511758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume.
    Zhao Y; de Bock GH; Vliegenthart R; van Klaveren RJ; Wang Y; Bogoni L; de Jong PA; Mali WP; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Oct; 22(10):2076-84. PubMed ID: 22814824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultralow dose CT for pulmonary nodule detection with chest x-ray equivalent dose - a prospective intra-individual comparative study.
    Messerli M; Kluckert T; Knitel M; Wälti S; Desbiolles L; Rengier F; Warschkow R; Bauer RW; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Wildermuth S
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3290-3299. PubMed ID: 28093625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 0.3-mSv CT to Standard-Dose CT for Detection of Lung Nodules in Children and Young Adults With Cancer.
    Thapaliya S; Gilligan LA; Brady SL; Anton CG; Crotty EJ; Nasser MP; Geller JI; Pressey JG; Zhang B; Dillman JR; Trout AT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1444-1451. PubMed ID: 34232694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of a deep learning-based lung nodule detection system as an alternative reader in a Chinese lung cancer screening program.
    Cui X; Zheng S; Heuvelmans MA; Du Y; Sidorenkov G; Fan S; Li Y; Xie Y; Zhu Z; Dorrius MD; Zhao Y; Veldhuis RNJ; de Bock GH; Oudkerk M; van Ooijen PMA; Vliegenthart R; Ye Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 146():110068. PubMed ID: 34871936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of pulmonary nodules with scoutless fixed-dose ultra-low-dose CT: a prospective study.
    Gheysens G; De Wever W; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Coudyzer W; De Vuysere S; Lefere M
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4437-4445. PubMed ID: 35238969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The performance of digital chest radiographs in the detection and diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and the consistency among readers].
    Liang M; Zhao SJ; Zhou LN; Xu XJ; Wang YW; Niu L; Wang HH; Tang W; Wu N
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Mar; 45(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 36944548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability in interpretation of low-dose chest CT using computerized assessment in a nationwide lung cancer screening program: comparison of prospective reading at individual institutions and retrospective central reading.
    Hwang EJ; Goo JM; Kim HY; Yoon SH; Jin GY; Yi J; Kim Y
    Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2845-2855. PubMed ID: 33123794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lung nodule detection performance in five observers on computed tomography (CT) with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D) in a Japanese multicenter study: Comparison between ultra-low-dose CT and low-dose CT by receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
    Nagatani Y; Takahashi M; Murata K; Ikeda M; Yamashiro T; Miyara T; Koyama H; Koyama M; Sato Y; Moriya H; Noma S; Tomiyama N; Ohno Y; Murayama S;
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1401-12. PubMed ID: 25892051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporation of a computer-aided vessel-suppression system to detect lung nodules in CT images: effect on sensitivity and reading time in routine clinical settings.
    Takaishi T; Ozawa Y; Bando Y; Yamamoto A; Okochi S; Suzuki H; Shibamoto Y
    Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 39(2):159-164. PubMed ID: 32940850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided detection of solid lung nodules on follow-up MDCT screening: evaluation of detection, tracking, and reading time.
    Beigelman-Aubry C; Raffy P; Yang W; Castellino RA; Grenier PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):948-55. PubMed ID: 17885070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic performance of a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules: comparison with single and double reading.
    Wormanns D; Beyer F; Diederich S; Ludwig K; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2004 Jul; 176(7):953-8. PubMed ID: 15237336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the performance of a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) system for detecting and characterizing lung nodules: Comparison with the performance of double reading by radiologists.
    Li L; Liu Z; Huang H; Lin M; Luo D
    Thorac Cancer; 2019 Feb; 10(2):183-192. PubMed ID: 30536611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.