These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36473749)

  • 1. Comparison of accuracy in digital and conventional cross-mounting.
    Luu D; Kan E; Kim SW; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 36473749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analyzing the accuracy of a cross-mounting technique utilizing digitized interocclusal records.
    Kan E; Luu D; Kim SW; Liu R; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38985110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy comparison of bilateral versus complete arch interocclusal registration scans for virtual articulation.
    Lee JD; Luu D; Yoon TW; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36813588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trueness of 4 sectional-cast digital methods for transferring the interocclusal relationship in complete mouth rehabilitation.
    Gao H; Liu X; Zhou T; Tan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37696746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods.
    Ries JM; Grünler C; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):994-1000. PubMed ID: 33888327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-based virtual mounting technique with that of the conventional mounting technique using a facebow.
    Kim SJ; Kang YJ; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37957064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
    Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans.
    Papaspyridakos P; Chen YW; Alshawaf B; Kang K; Finkelman M; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):589-593. PubMed ID: 31959396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of virtually mounted dental casts from traditional facebow records, average values, and 3D facial scans.
    Inoue N; Scialabba R; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 35382941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital mounting accuracy of 2 intraoral scanners with a single anterior or bilateral posterior occlusal scan: A three-dimensional analysis.
    Cha C; Pyo SW; Chang JS; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):612.e1-612.e8. PubMed ID: 37633731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo precision of digital static interocclusal registration for full arch and quadrant arch scans: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Morsy N; El Kateb M
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):559. PubMed ID: 36456986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques.
    Iwauchi Y; Tanaka S; Kamimura-Sugimura E; Baba K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 33775391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional analysis of the outcome of different scanning strategies in virtual interocclusal registration.
    Mei J; Ma L; Chao J; Liu F; Shen J
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 14(6):369-378. PubMed ID: 36685791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of virtual interocclusal records for partially edentulous patients.
    Ren S; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):860-865. PubMed ID: 31672422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36349566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of stereolithography additive casts used in a digital workflow.
    Al-Imam H; Gram M; Benetti AR; Gotfredsen K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):580-585. PubMed ID: 28781073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols.
    Peng L; Chen L; Harris BT; Bhandari B; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-Dimensional Static Articulation Accuracy of Virtual Models-Part II: Effect of Model Scanner-CAD Systems and Articulation Method.
    Yee SHX; Esguerra RJ; Chew AAQ; Wong KM; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):137-144. PubMed ID: 29210502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.