These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36476319)

  • 1. Convolutional neural network -based phantom image scoring for mammography quality control.
    Sundell VM; Mäkelä T; Vitikainen AM; Kaasalainen T
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Dec; 22(1):216. PubMed ID: 36476319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dead detector element detection in flat panels using convolutional neural networks.
    Box J; Salazar A; Johnson D; Rutel I
    Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2061-2070. PubMed ID: 36367521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A deep learning framework for automatic detection of arbitrarily shaped fiducial markers in intrafraction fluoroscopic images.
    Mylonas A; Keall PJ; Booth JT; Shieh CC; Eade T; Poulsen PR; Nguyen DT
    Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2286-2297. PubMed ID: 30929254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Projection-domain scatter correction for cone beam computed tomography using a residual convolutional neural network.
    Nomura Y; Xu Q; Shirato H; Shimizu S; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):3142-3155. PubMed ID: 31077390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A performance comparison of convolutional neural network-based image denoising methods: The effect of loss functions on low-dose CT images.
    Kim B; Han M; Shim H; Baek J
    Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3906-3923. PubMed ID: 31306488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated analysis of the American College of Radiology mammographic accreditation phantom images.
    Brooks KW; Trueblood JH; Kearfott KJ; Lawton DT
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):709-23. PubMed ID: 9167162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring CNN potential in discriminating benign and malignant calcifications in conventional and dual-energy FFDM: simulations and experimental observations.
    Makeev A; Rodal G; Ghammraoui B; Badal A; Glick SJ
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2021 May; 8(3):033501. PubMed ID: 34002162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of wavelets to the evaluation of phantom images for mammography quality control.
    Alvarez M; Pina DR; Miranda JR; Duarte SB
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7177-90. PubMed ID: 23060095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning framework for automatic image quality evaluation involving a mammographic American College of Radiology phantom.
    Ho PS; Hwang YS; Tsai HY
    Phys Med; 2022 Oct; 102():1-8. PubMed ID: 36030664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM; Dance DR
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul; 9(7):764-72. PubMed ID: 12139090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated daily quality control analysis for mammography in a multi-unit imaging center.
    Sundell VM; Mäkelä T; Meaney A; Kaasalainen T; Savolainen S
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Feb; 60(2):140-148. PubMed ID: 29768928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Convolutional Networks and Transformers for Mammography Classification: An Experimental Study.
    Cantone M; Marrocco C; Tortorella F; Bria A
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography Image Quality Assurance Using Deep Learning.
    Kretz T; Mueller KR; Schaeffter T; Elster C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Dec; 67(12):3317-3326. PubMed ID: 32305886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which phantom is better for assessing the image quality in full-field digital mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation phantom versus digital mammography accreditation phantom.
    Song SE; Seo BK; Yie A; Ku BK; Kim HY; Cho KR; Chung HH; Lee SH; Hwang KW
    Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(6):776-83. PubMed ID: 23118577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A convolutional neural network trained with dermoscopic images performed on par with 145 dermatologists in a clinical melanoma image classification task.
    Brinker TJ; Hekler A; Enk AH; Klode J; Hauschild A; Berking C; Schilling B; Haferkamp S; Schadendorf D; Fröhling S; Utikal JS; von Kalle C;
    Eur J Cancer; 2019 Apr; 111():148-154. PubMed ID: 30852421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classification of Mammogram Images Using Multiscale all Convolutional Neural Network (MA-CNN).
    Agnes SA; Anitha J; Pandian SIA; Peter JD
    J Med Syst; 2019 Dec; 44(1):30. PubMed ID: 31838610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative versus subjective evaluation of mammography accreditation phantom images.
    Chakraborty DP; Eckert MP
    Med Phys; 1995 Feb; 22(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 7565344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated classification of solid renal masses on contrast-enhanced computed tomography images using convolutional neural network with decision fusion.
    Zabihollahy F; Schieda N; Krishna S; Ukwatta E
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):5183-5190. PubMed ID: 32350661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning hidden patterns from patient multivariate time series data using convolutional neural networks: A case study of healthcare cost prediction.
    Morid MA; Sheng ORL; Kawamoto K; Abdelrahman S
    J Biomed Inform; 2020 Nov; 111():103565. PubMed ID: 32980530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Devising a deep neural network based mammography phantom image filtering algorithm using images obtained under mAs and kVp control.
    Park SS; Ku YM; Seo KJ; Whang IY; Hwang YS; Kim MJ; Jung NY
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3545. PubMed ID: 36864167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.