These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. What is the real price of cost containment? Morris SN J Intraven Nurs; 1989; 12(1 Suppl):S19-22. PubMed ID: 2913263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving practice through research: the case of heparin vs. saline for peripheral intermittent infusion devices. Goode CJ; Kleiber C; Titler M; Small S; Rakel B; Steelman VM; Walker JB; Buckwalter KC Medsurg Nurs; 1993 Feb; 2(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 8319047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of heparin and normal saline flushes in neonatal intravenous catheters. Paisley MK; Stamper M; Brown J; Brown N; Ganong LH Pediatr Nurs; 1997; 23(5):521-4, 527. PubMed ID: 9355594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Normal saline flush vs. dilute heparin flush. Gardner C J Intraven Nurs; 1988; 11(3):206. PubMed ID: 3373368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. More on saline flush study. J Emerg Nurs; 1998 Jun; 24(3):207-8. PubMed ID: 9775795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Heparinized saline or normal saline as a flush solution in intermittent intravenous lines in infants and children. McMullen A; Fioravanti ID; Pollack V; Rideout K; Sciera M MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1993; 18(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 8492651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Normal saline vs. heparin lock flush solution: one institution's findings. Miracle V; Fangman B; Kayrouz P; Kederis S; Pursell L Ky Nurse; 1989; 37(3):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 2761272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized controlled trial for maintaining peripheral intravenous lock in children. Mok E; Kwong TK; Chan MF Int J Nurs Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 17244243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heparin lock flush solution versus 0.9% sodium chloride injection for maintaining patency. Witmer DR Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Feb; 50(2):241. PubMed ID: 8480774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Heparin vs. saline for peripheral i.v. locks in children. Kleiber C; Hanrahan K; Fagan CL; Zittergruen MA Pediatr Nurs; 1993; 19(4):405-9, 376. PubMed ID: 8414730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double blind comparison of heparin and saline flush solutions in maintenance of peripheral infusion devices. Gyr P; Burroughs T; Smith K; Mahl C; Pontious S; Swerczek L Pediatr Nurs; 1995; 21(4):383-9, 366. PubMed ID: 7644289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Changing from heparin to saline flush solutions: a research utilization model for implementation. McAllister CC; Lenaghan PA; Tosone NC J Emerg Nurs; 1993 Aug; 19(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 8350549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospitals eliminating heparin from I.V. catheter flushes save money, reduce patient side effects. Barlow RD Hosp Mater Manage; 1992 Mar; 17(3):16. PubMed ID: 10117866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research article on "efficacy of normal saline solution vs. heparin solution" applauded. Paton EA J Emerg Nurs; 1998 Apr; 24(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 9775815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Heparin versus normal saline as a peripheral line flush in maintenance of intermittent intravenous lines in obstetric patients. Meyer BA; Little CJ; Thorp JA; Cohen GR; Yeast JD Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 85(3):433-6. PubMed ID: 7862386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of 0.9% sodium chloride injection with and without heparin for maintaining indwelling intermittent injection sites. Epperson EL Clin Pharm; 1984; 3(6):626-9. PubMed ID: 6509875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The case for the heparin flush. Cyganski JM; Donahue JM; Heaton JS Am J Nurs; 1987 Jun; 87(6):796-7. PubMed ID: 3647723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Normal saline flush versus dilute heparin flush. A study of peripheral intermittent i.v. devices. Shearer J NITA; 1987; 10(6):425-7. PubMed ID: 3696458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]