These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36477804)

  • 1. Implementation of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: learning curve of a single high-volume center.
    Stuart SK; Kuypers TJL; Martijnse IS; Heisterkamp J; Matthijsen RA
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 May; 36(6):. PubMed ID: 36477804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
    van Workum F; Stenstra MHBC; Berkelmans GHK; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Irino T; Nilsson M; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MD; Adang EM; Hannink G; Rovers MM; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jan; 269(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 28857809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning Curves of Ivor Lewis Totally Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy by Hospital and Surgeon Characteristics: A Retrospective Multinational Cohort Study.
    Claassen L; Hannink G; Luyer MDP; Ainsworth AP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Cheong E; Daams F; van Det MJ; van Duijvendijk P; Gisbertz SS; Gutschow CA; Heisterkamp J; Kauppi JT; Klarenbeek BR; Kouwenhoven EA; Langenhoff BS; Larsen MH; Martijnse IS; Nieuwenhoven EJV; van der Peet DL; Pierie JEN; Pierik REGJM; Polat F; Räsänen JV; Rouvelas I; Sosef MN; Wassenaar EB; Wildenberg FJHVD; van der Zaag ES; Nilsson M; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van Workum F; Rosman C;
    Ann Surg; 2022 May; 275(5):911-918. PubMed ID: 33605581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Casas MA; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Schlottmann F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):473-481. PubMed ID: 34955315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
    Yang X; Zhan C; Sun F; Chen L; Shi M; Jiang W; Wang Q
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):979-984. PubMed ID: 27680063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A pilot randomized controlled trial on the utility of gastric conditioning in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The APIL_2013 Trial.
    Mils K; Miró M; Farran L; Videla S; Alba E; Estremiana F; Bettonica C; Aranda H
    Int J Surg; 2022 Oct; 106():106921. PubMed ID: 36116675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the "flap and wrap" reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.
    Slaman AE; Eshuis WJ; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35724430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Transhiatal, McKeown or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Verstegen MHP; Slaman AE; Klarenbeek BR; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Rosman C; van Workum F
    World J Surg; 2021 Nov; 45(11):3341-3349. PubMed ID: 34373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: An excellent operation that improves with experience.
    White A; Kucukak S; Lee DN; Mazzola E; Zhang Y; Swanson SJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Feb; 157(2):783-789. PubMed ID: 30459111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-Stage Indicators to Assess Learning Curves for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
    Wang Q; Wu Z; Chen G; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 66(5):362-369. PubMed ID: 27706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of the surgical technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: description according to the IDEAL framework.
    Stenstra MHBC; van Workum F; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Rosman C
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Mar; 32(3):. PubMed ID: 30247660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic value of drain amylase for detecting intrathoracic leakage after esophagectomy.
    Berkelmans GH; Kouwenhoven EA; Smeets BJ; Weijs TJ; Silva Corten LC; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Luyer MD
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 21(30):9118-25. PubMed ID: 26290638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome of Self-Expanding Metal Stents in the Treatment of Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
    Plum PS; Herbold T; Berlth F; Christ H; Alakus H; Bludau M; Chang DH; Bruns CJ; Hölscher AH; Chon SH
    World J Surg; 2019 Mar; 43(3):862-869. PubMed ID: 30377723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Peng X; Chen Y; Nassor Juma A; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Jiao Y; Zhang W; Zhuang W
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 May; 42(5):546-552. PubMed ID: 28626101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Circular vs. linear stapling after minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a pooled analysis.
    Finze A; Betzler J; Hetjens S; Reissfelder C; Otto M; Blank S
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Aug; 407(5):1831-1838. PubMed ID: 35731445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.