These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36481036)

  • 1. Risk-based merging decisions for autonomous vehicles.
    Jin W; Islam M; Chowdhury M
    J Safety Res; 2022 Dec; 83():45-56. PubMed ID: 36481036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform.
    Chen P; Ni H; Wang L; Yu G; Sun J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 May; 199():107530. PubMed ID: 38437756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Operational design domain of automated vehicles at freeway entrance terminals.
    Ye X; Wang X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106776. PubMed ID: 35870304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety analysis of freeway on-ramp merging with the presence of autonomous vehicles.
    Zhu J; Tasic I
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():105966. PubMed ID: 33493941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longitudinal traffic conflict analysis of autonomous and traditional vehicle platoons in field tests via surrogate safety measures.
    Das T; Shoaib Samandar M; Rouphail N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106822. PubMed ID: 36103759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of pre-crash scenarios and contributing factors for autonomous vehicle crashes at intersections.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Liu S; Yu C; Glaser Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107383. PubMed ID: 37984113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Collaborative Merging Method for Connected and Automated Vehicle Platoons in a Freeway Merging Area with Considerations for Safety and Efficiency.
    Gao H; Cen Y; Liu B; Song X; Liu H; Liu J
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.
    Mahdinia I; Mohammadnazar A; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106006. PubMed ID: 33556655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.
    Rettenmaier M; Dinkel S; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103438. PubMed ID: 33895469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards human-like speed control in autonomous vehicles: A mountainous freeway case.
    Chen Z; Wang X; Guo Q; Tarko A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106566. PubMed ID: 35026555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proactive crash risk prediction modeling for merging assistance system at interchange merging areas.
    Gu X; Cai Q; Lee J; Xiang Q; Ma Y; Xu X
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):234-240. PubMed ID: 32154738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crash Risk Prediction Modeling Based on the Traffic Conflict Technique and a Microscopic Simulation for Freeway Interchange Merging Areas.
    Li S; Xiang Q; Ma Y; Gu X; Li H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 27869763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An optimal control-based vehicle speed guidance strategy to improve traffic safety and efficiency against freeway jam waves.
    Han Y; Yu H; Li Z; Xu C; Ji Y; Liu P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106429. PubMed ID: 34638010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk-informed decision-making and control strategies for autonomous vehicles in emergency situations.
    Nguyen HD; Choi M; Han K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Dec; 193():107305. PubMed ID: 37741202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-vehicle interaction safety of connected automated vehicles in merging area: A real-time risk assessment approach.
    Zhu J; Ma Y; Lou Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106546. PubMed ID: 34965492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utilizing UAV video data for in-depth analysis of drivers' crash risk at interchange merging areas.
    Gu X; Abdel-Aty M; Xiang Q; Cai Q; Yuan J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():159-169. PubMed ID: 30513457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Li Z; Zhang H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human-like car-following model for autonomous vehicles considering the cut-in behavior of other vehicles in mixed traffic.
    Fu R; Li Z; Sun Q; Wang C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105260. PubMed ID: 31442924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and operational impact of connected vehicles' lane configuration on freeway facilities with managed lanes.
    Abdel-Aty M; Wu Y; Saad M; Rahman MS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105616. PubMed ID: 32516578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.