169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36482285)
1. Comparison of adenoma detection rate and proximal serrated polyp detection rate and their effect on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer mortality in screening patients.
Zessner-Spitzenberg J; Waldmann E; Jiricka L; Rockenbauer LM; Hinterberger A; Cook J; Asaturi A; Szymanska A; Majcher B; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2023 May; 55(5):434-441. PubMed ID: 36482285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Wisse PHA; Erler NS; de Boer SY; den Hartog B; Oudkerk Pool M; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Verveer C; Meijer GA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1366-1373. PubMed ID: 36162114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adenoma Detection Rate and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Programs : An Observational Cohort Study.
Zorzi M; Antonelli G; Barbiellini Amidei C; Battagello J; Germanà B; Valiante F; Benvenuti S; Tringali A; Bortoluzzi F; Cervellin E; Giacomin D; Meggiato T; Rosa-Rizzotto E; Fregonese D; Dinca M; Baldassarre G; Scalon P; Pantalena M; Milan L; Bulighin G; Di Piramo D; Azzurro M; Gabbrielli A; Repici A; Rex DK; Rugge M; Hassan C; ; Giacomin A; Buda A; Costa D; Checchin D; Marin R; Patarnello E; Ceriani A; Guido E; Bertomoro P; Merlini N; Murer F; Ntakirutimana E; Benazzato L; Bellocchi MCC
Ann Intern Med; 2023 Mar; 176(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 36802754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Hisey W; Mackenzie TA; Robinson CM; Srivastava A; Meester RGS; Butterly LF
Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Aug; 96(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 35276209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between proximal serrated polyp detection and clinically significant serrated polyps: inter-endoscopist variability.
Parra-Pérez VF; Watanabe Yamamoto J; Nago-Nago A; Astete-Benavides M; Rodríguez-Ulloa C; Valladares-Álvarez G; Núñez-Calixto N; Yoza-Yoshidaira MA; Gargurevich-Sánchez TM; Pinto-Sánchez JF; Niebuhr-Kakiuchi JC; Uehara-Miyagusuku GA; Rodríguez-Grandez JI; Komazona-Sugajara R; Limas-Cline P; Hernández-García H; Kishimoto-Tsukazan G
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed); 2021; 86(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34272192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Serrated polyp detection rate in colonoscopies performed by gastrointestinal fellows.
Heckroth M; Eiswerth M; Elmasry M; Gala K; Cai W; Diamond S; Shine A; Liu D; Liu N; Tholkage S; Kong M; Parajuli D
Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc; 2022; 15():26317745221136775. PubMed ID: 36531201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective analysis of the histology of resected polyps and colonoscopy quality parameters in Belgium.
Macken E; Van Dongen S; Van Hal G
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2023; 86(2):277-285. PubMed ID: 37428160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy.
Waldmann E; Kammerlander AA; Gessl I; Penz D; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Bretthauer M; Trauner MH; Ferlitsch M
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1890-1898. PubMed ID: 33878471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of differences in adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rate on the long-term effectiveness of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening.
Bronzwaer MES; Greuter MJE; Bleijenberg AGC; IJspeert JEG; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):465. PubMed ID: 29695244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
