These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36482285)

  • 1. Comparison of adenoma detection rate and proximal serrated polyp detection rate and their effect on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer mortality in screening patients.
    Zessner-Spitzenberg J; Waldmann E; Jiricka L; Rockenbauer LM; Hinterberger A; Cook J; Asaturi A; Szymanska A; Majcher B; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2023 May; 55(5):434-441. PubMed ID: 36482285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Wisse PHA; Erler NS; de Boer SY; den Hartog B; Oudkerk Pool M; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Verveer C; Meijer GA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1366-1373. PubMed ID: 36162114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adenoma Detection Rate and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Programs : An Observational Cohort Study.
    Zorzi M; Antonelli G; Barbiellini Amidei C; Battagello J; Germanà B; Valiante F; Benvenuti S; Tringali A; Bortoluzzi F; Cervellin E; Giacomin D; Meggiato T; Rosa-Rizzotto E; Fregonese D; Dinca M; Baldassarre G; Scalon P; Pantalena M; Milan L; Bulighin G; Di Piramo D; Azzurro M; Gabbrielli A; Repici A; Rex DK; Rugge M; Hassan C; ; Giacomin A; Buda A; Costa D; Checchin D; Marin R; Patarnello E; Ceriani A; Guido E; Bertomoro P; Merlini N; Murer F; Ntakirutimana E; Benazzato L; Bellocchi MCC
    Ann Intern Med; 2023 Mar; 176(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 36802754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
    Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
    IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Hisey W; Mackenzie TA; Robinson CM; Srivastava A; Meester RGS; Butterly LF
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Aug; 96(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 35276209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation between proximal serrated polyp detection and clinically significant serrated polyps: inter-endoscopist variability.
    Parra-Pérez VF; Watanabe Yamamoto J; Nago-Nago A; Astete-Benavides M; Rodríguez-Ulloa C; Valladares-Álvarez G; Núñez-Calixto N; Yoza-Yoshidaira MA; Gargurevich-Sánchez TM; Pinto-Sánchez JF; Niebuhr-Kakiuchi JC; Uehara-Miyagusuku GA; Rodríguez-Grandez JI; Komazona-Sugajara R; Limas-Cline P; Hernández-García H; Kishimoto-Tsukazan G
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed); 2021; 86(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34272192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
    Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
    Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Serrated polyp detection rate in colonoscopies performed by gastrointestinal fellows.
    Heckroth M; Eiswerth M; Elmasry M; Gala K; Cai W; Diamond S; Shine A; Liu D; Liu N; Tholkage S; Kong M; Parajuli D
    Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc; 2022; 15():26317745221136775. PubMed ID: 36531201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
    Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective analysis of the histology of resected polyps and colonoscopy quality parameters in Belgium.
    Macken E; Van Dongen S; Van Hal G
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2023; 86(2):277-285. PubMed ID: 37428160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
    Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy.
    Waldmann E; Kammerlander AA; Gessl I; Penz D; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Bretthauer M; Trauner MH; Ferlitsch M
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1890-1898. PubMed ID: 33878471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
    Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of differences in adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rate on the long-term effectiveness of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening.
    Bronzwaer MES; Greuter MJE; Bleijenberg AGC; IJspeert JEG; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):465. PubMed ID: 29695244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.