These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36483758)

  • 1. Spatial scales of competition and a growth-motility trade-off interact to determine bacterial coexistence.
    Kuhn T; Mamin M; Bindschedler S; Bshary R; Estoppey A; Gonzalez D; Palmieri F; Junier P; Richter XL
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Dec; 9(12):211592. PubMed ID: 36483758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species.
    Amarasekare P; Nisbet RM
    Am Nat; 2001 Dec; 158(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 18707352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The competition-colonization trade-off is dead; long live the competition-colonization trade-off.
    Yu DW; Wilson HB
    Am Nat; 2001 Jul; 158(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 18707314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coexistence of competitors in marine metacommunities: environmental variability, edge effects, and the dispersal niche.
    Aiken CM; Navarrete SA
    Ecology; 2014 Aug; 95(8):2289-302. PubMed ID: 25230479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How the spatial scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity interact to affect coexistence.
    Snyder RE; Chesson P
    Am Nat; 2004 Nov; 164(5):633-50. PubMed ID: 15540153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ecological traits and the spatial structure of competitive coexistence among carnivores.
    Monterroso P; Díaz-Ruiz F; Lukacs PM; Alves PC; Ferreras P
    Ecology; 2020 Aug; 101(8):e03059. PubMed ID: 32333382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breaking down the components of the competition-colonization trade-off: New insights into its role in diverse systems.
    Ferzoco IMC; McCauley SJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 Feb; 92(2):352-366. PubMed ID: 36385373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mass effects mediate coexistence in competing shrews.
    Guélat J; Jaquiéry J; Berset-Brändli L; Pellegrini E; Moresi R; Broquet T; Hirzel AH; Perrin N
    Ecology; 2008 Jul; 89(7):2033-42. PubMed ID: 18705388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trait plasticity alters the range of possible coexistence conditions in a competition-colonisation trade-off.
    Muthukrishnan R; Sullivan LL; Shaw AK; Forester JD
    Ecol Lett; 2020 May; 23(5):791-799. PubMed ID: 32086876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanisms of coexistence in competitive metacommunities.
    Amarasekare P; Hoopes MF; Mouquet N; Holyoak M
    Am Nat; 2004 Sep; 164(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 15478087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial variation and density-dependent dispersal in competitive coexistence.
    Amarasekare P
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Jul; 271(1547):1497-506. PubMed ID: 15306322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ecological succession and the competition-colonization trade-off in microbial communities.
    Wetherington MT; Nagy K; Dér L; Ábrahám Á; Noorlag J; Galajda P; Keymer JE
    BMC Biol; 2022 Nov; 20(1):262. PubMed ID: 36447225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competition and coexistence in spatially subdivided habitats.
    Wang ZL; Zhang JG; Liu XM
    J Theor Biol; 2000 Aug; 205(4):631-9. PubMed ID: 10931757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trade-offs and coexistence in fluctuating environments: evidence for a key dispersal-fecundity trade-off in five nonpollinating fig wasps.
    Duthie AB; Abbott KC; Nason JD
    Am Nat; 2015 Jul; 186(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 26098346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coexistence and relative abundance in annual plant assemblages: the roles of competition and colonization.
    Levine JM; Rees M
    Am Nat; 2002 Oct; 160(4):452-67. PubMed ID: 18707522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trade-offs, temporal variation, and species coexistence in communities with intraguild predation.
    Amarasekare P
    Ecology; 2007 Nov; 88(11):2720-8. PubMed ID: 18051639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bacterial coexistence driven by motility and spatial competition.
    Gude S; Pinçe E; Taute KM; Seinen AB; Shimizu TS; Tans SJ
    Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7796):588-592. PubMed ID: 32076271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specialization and niche overlap across spatial scales: Revealing ecological factors shaping species richness and coexistence in Australian songbirds.
    Harmáčková L; Remešová E; Remeš V
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Nov; 88(11):1766-1776. PubMed ID: 31329280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Difference in [corrected] adaptive dispersal ability can promote species coexistence in fluctuating environments.
    Lin WT; Hsieh CH; Miki T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e55218. PubMed ID: 23383314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coexistence of species with different dispersal across landscapes: a critical role of spatial correlation in disturbance.
    Liao J; Ying Z; Woolnough DA; Miller AD; Li Z; Nijs I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 May; 283(1830):. PubMed ID: 27147101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.