These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effect of Post-Dilatation Following Primary PCI With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: An Angiographic and Optical Coherence Tomography TROFI II Substudy. Yamaji K; Brugaletta S; Sabaté M; Iñiguez A; Jensen LO; Cequier A; Hofma SH; Christiansen EH; Suttorp M; van Es GA; Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Windecker S; Räber L JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(18):1867-1877. PubMed ID: 28935079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable stent vs. durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized ABSORB ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-TROFI II trial. Sabaté M; Windecker S; Iñiguez A; Okkels-Jensen L; Cequier A; Brugaletta S; Hofma SH; Räber L; Christiansen EH; Suttorp M; Pilgrim T; Anne van Es G; Sotomi Y; García-García HM; Onuma Y; Serruys PW Eur Heart J; 2016 Jan; 37(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 26405232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction). Brugaletta S; Gori T; Low AF; Tousek P; Pinar E; Gomez-Lara J; Scalone G; Schulz E; Chan MY; Kocka V; Hurtado J; Gomez-Hospital JA; Münzel T; Lee CH; Cequier A; Valdés M; Widimsky P; Serruys PW; Sabaté M JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt B):189-197. PubMed ID: 25616924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial. Serruys PW; Chevalier B; Sotomi Y; Cequier A; Carrié D; Piek JJ; Van Boven AJ; Dominici M; Dudek D; McClean D; Helqvist S; Haude M; Reith S; de Sousa Almeida M; Campo G; Iñiguez A; Sabaté M; Windecker S; Onuma Y Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10059):2479-2491. PubMed ID: 27806897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries. Tamburino C; Capranzano P; Gori T; Latib A; Lesiak M; Nef H; Caramanno G; Naber C; Mehilli J; Di Mario C; Sabaté M; Münzel T; Colombo A; Araszkiewicz A; Wiebe J; Geraci S; Jensen C; Mattesini A; Brugaletta S; Capodanno D JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(5):440-9. PubMed ID: 26875648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial. Serruys PW; Chevalier B; Dudek D; Cequier A; Carrié D; Iniguez A; Dominici M; van der Schaaf RJ; Haude M; Wasungu L; Veldhof S; Peng L; Staehr P; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y Lancet; 2015 Jan; 385(9962):43-54. PubMed ID: 25230593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re-endothelialisation after Synergy stent and Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute myocardial infarction: COVER-AMI study. Lhermusier T; Ohayon P; Boudou N; Bouisset F; Campelo-Parada F; Roncalli J; Elbaz M; Carrié D Trials; 2019 Apr; 20(1):210. PubMed ID: 30975219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of everolimus eluting bioabsorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) compared to non BVS drug eluting stent in the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) - A comparative study. Chakraborty R; Patra S; Banerjee S; Pande A; Khan A; Mandol PC; Ghosh D; De SK; Das SS; Nag R Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 26905052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optical coherence tomography tissue coverage and characterization at six months after implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds versus conventional everolimus eluting stents in the ISAR-Absorb MI trial. Rai H; Alfonso F; Maeng M; Bradaric C; Wiebe J; Cuesta J; Christiansen EH; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Colleran R; Harzer F; Bresha J; Nano N; Schneider S; Laugwitz KL; Joner M; Kastrati A; Byrne RA Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Oct; 37(10):2815-2826. PubMed ID: 34420177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of newer-generation drug-eluting with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of the EXAMINATION (clinical Evaluation of the Xience-V stent in Acute Myocardial INfArcTION) and COMFORTABLE-AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trials. Sabaté M; Räber L; Heg D; Brugaletta S; Kelbaek H; Cequier A; Ostojic M; Iñiguez A; Tüller D; Serra A; Baumbach A; von Birgelen C; Hernandez-Antolin R; Roffi M; Mainar V; Valgimigli M; Serruys PW; Jüni P; Windecker S JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24332419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial. Iglesias JF; Muller O; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Moarof I; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Tapponnier M; Stortecky S; Losdat S; Eeckhout E; Valgimigli M; Odutayo A; Zwahlen M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T Lancet; 2019 Oct; 394(10205):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 31488372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]