165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36484296)
1. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: laparoscopic or robotic approach?
Maharsi S; Lipham JC; Houghton CC
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36484296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LINX
Skubleny D; Switzer NJ; Dang J; Gill RS; Shi X; de Gara C; Birch DW; Wong C; Hutter MM; Karmali S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3078-3084. PubMed ID: 27981382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Treatment of Medically Refractory GERD.
Richards WO; McRae C
Am Surg; 2018 Nov; 84(11):1762-1767. PubMed ID: 30747630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Charges, outcomes, and complications: a comparison of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of GERD.
Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Nieh A; Bildzukewicz N; Sandhu K; Katkhouda N; Lipham JC
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3225-30. PubMed ID: 26541730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis.
Guidozzi N; Wiggins T; Ahmed AR; Hanna GB; Markar SR
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Nov; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 31069388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation vs Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 100 Patients.
Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Wu P; Shah S; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 26095560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Asti E; Bernardi D; Bonitta G; Rausa E; Siboni S; Bonavina L
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():82-88. PubMed ID: 29471155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic LINX Placement: Is it Worth It?
Wahi JE; Le C; Yousef M; Hernandez E; Stickles MG; Ben-David K
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 May; 31(5):526-529. PubMed ID: 33784476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic challenge against gastroesophageal reflux.
Bortolotti M
World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Dec; 27(48):8227-8241. PubMed ID: 35068867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies.
Asti E; Aiolfi A; Lazzari V; Sironi A; Porta M; Bonavina L
Updates Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):323-330. PubMed ID: 30022361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective.
Pandolfino J; Lipham J; Chawla A; Ferko N; Hogan A; Qadeer RA
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1561-1572. PubMed ID: 31559575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "The missing LINX" for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Operative techniques video for the Linx magnetic sphincter augmentation procedure.
Kuckelman JP; Barron MR; Martin MJ
Am J Surg; 2017 May; 213(5):984-987. PubMed ID: 28351472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Application of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease].
Li ZG
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 58(9):683-686. PubMed ID: 32878414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Longitudinal comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication versus magnetic sphincter augmentation: Observational cohort study with propensity score analysis.
Asti E; Bonitta G; Lovece A; Lazzari V; Bonavina L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(30):e4366. PubMed ID: 27472725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Esophageal magnetic sphincter augmentation following bariatric surgery improves quality of life and reduces proton pump inhibitor usage.
Peine BS; Denning MT; Brea F; Wolf SE; Bethea JP; Speicher JE; Anciano CJ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Jan; 28(1):72-74. PubMed ID: 38353078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is systematic formal crural repair mandatory at the time of magnetic sphincter augmentation implantation?
Bell R
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36617229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: a viable rescue therapy for symptomatic reflux following bariatric surgery.
Broderick RC; Smith CD; Cheverie JN; Omelanczuk P; Lee AM; Dominguez-Profeta R; Cubas R; Jacobsen GR; Sandler BJ; Fuchs KH; Horgan S
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jul; 34(7):3211-3215. PubMed ID: 31485930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: pros and cons.
Sterris JA; Dunn CP; Bildzukewicz NA; Lipham JC
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 36(4):323-328. PubMed ID: 32398565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Zhang H; Dong D; Liu Z; He S; Hu L; Lv Y
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3684-90. PubMed ID: 26659236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Warren HF; Reynolds JL; Lipham JC; Zehetner J; Bildzukewicz NA; Taiganides PA; Mickley J; Aye RW; Farivar AS; Louie BE
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3289-96. PubMed ID: 26541740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
