118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36484816)
21. Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy.
Koie T; Mitsuzuka K; Yoneyama T; Narita S; Kawamura S; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C; Yoneyama T; Tobisawa Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Feb; 20(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 24771079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Identify Aggressive Prostate Cancer at the Phenotypic and Transcriptomic Level.
Beksac AT; Cumarasamy S; Falagario U; Xu P; Takhar M; Alshalalfa M; Gupta A; Prasad S; Martini A; Thulasidass H; Rai R; Berger M; Hectors S; Jordan J; Davicioni E; Nair S; Haines K; Lewis S; Rastinehad A; Yadav K; Jayaratna I; Taouli B; Tewari A
J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1241-1249. PubMed ID: 30563651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Risk Stratification of Patients Candidate to Radical Prostatectomy Based on Clinical and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters: Development and External Validation of Novel Risk Groups.
Mazzone E; Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Marra G; Valerio M; Campi R; Mari A; Minervini A; Serni S; Moschini M; Marquis A; Beauval JB; van den Bergh R; Rahota RG; Soeterik T; Roumiguiè M; Afferi L; Zhuang J; Guo H; Mattei A; Gontero P; Cucchiara V; Stabile A; Fossati N; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2022 Feb; 81(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 34399996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and multi-institutional validation of an upgrading risk tool for Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Truong M; Slezak JA; Lin CP; Iremashvili V; Sado M; Razmaria AA; Leverson G; Soloway MS; Eggener SE; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
Cancer; 2013 Nov; 119(22):3992-4002. PubMed ID: 24006289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nomogram Predicting Adverse Pathology Outcome on Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Men.
Nasri J; Barthe F; Parekh S; Ratnani P; Pedraza AM; Wagaskar VG; Olivier J; Villers A; Tewari A
Urology; 2022 Aug; 166():189-195. PubMed ID: 35263642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population.
Karnes RJ; Bergstralh EJ; Davicioni E; Ghadessi M; Buerki C; Mitra AP; Crisan A; Erho N; Vergara IA; Lam LL; Carlson R; Thompson DJ; Haddad Z; Zimmermann B; Sierocinski T; Triche TJ; Kollmeyer T; Ballman KV; Black PC; Klee GG; Jenkins RB
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2047-53. PubMed ID: 23770138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A solitary positive prostate cancer biopsy does not predict a unilateral lesion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Koie T; Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Yoneyama T; Kawamura S; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C
Scand J Urol; 2015 Apr; 49(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 25165894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Correlation between MRI phenotypes and a genomic classifier of prostate cancer: preliminary findings.
Purysko AS; Magi-Galluzzi C; Mian OY; Sittenfeld S; Davicioni E; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Bullen J; Li L; Madabhushi A; Stephenson A; Klein EA
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4861-4870. PubMed ID: 30847589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Liu H; Tang K; Xia D; Peng E; Wang L; Chen Z
Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Nov; 216(11):153235. PubMed ID: 33035728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predictive value of four kallikrein markers for pathologically insignificant compared with aggressive prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer section Rotterdam.
Carlsson S; Maschino A; Schröder F; Bangma C; Steyerberg EW; van der Kwast T; van Leenders G; Vickers A; Lilja H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2013 Nov; 64(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 23683475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Novel nomogram for the prediction of seminal vesicle invasion including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Martini A; Gupta A; Cumarasamy S; Lewis SC; Haines KG; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Tewari AK
Int J Urol; 2019 Apr; 26(4):458-464. PubMed ID: 30659663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Defining Prostate Cancer at Favorable Intermediate Risk: The Potential Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Genomic Tests.
Falagario UG; Beksac AT; Martini A; Cumarasamy S; Gupta A; Prasad S; Thulasidass H; Shah QN; Jayaratna I; Lewis S; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Tewari AK
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 30730408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical role of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy confirmed Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer.
Gondo T; Poon BY; Matsumoto K; Bernstein M; Sjoberg DD; Eastham JA
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 24725760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of the Pathologic Gleason Score to Inform a Personalized Management Program for Prostate Cancer.
Coley RY; Zeger SL; Mamawala M; Pienta KJ; Carter HB
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 27523594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The CPC Risk Calculator: A New App to Predict Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence During Follow-up After Radical Prostatectomy.
Røder MA; Berg KD; Loft MD; Thomsen FB; Ferrari M; Kurbegovic S; Rytgaard HC; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Gerds TA; Kjær A; Brooks JD; Iversen P
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 28753827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radiomics Based on MRI as a Biomarker to Guide Therapy by Predicting Upgrading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.
Zhang GM; Han YQ; Wei JW; Qi YF; Gu DS; Lei J; Yan WG; Xiao Y; Xue HD; Feng F; Sun H; Jin ZY; Tian J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Oct; 52(4):1239-1248. PubMed ID: 32181985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4.
Kim H; Kim JK; Hong SK; Jeong CW; Ku JH; Kwak C
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1825-1830. PubMed ID: 32869150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
