122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36484849)
1. Developing a three-dimensional statistical shape model of normal dentition using an automated algorithm and normal samples.
Kim HH; Choi S; Chang YI; Yi WJ; Ahn SJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):759-772. PubMed ID: 36484849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph.
Zheng G
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1424-39. PubMed ID: 20443464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Joint optimization of segmentation and shape prior from level-set-based statistical shape model, and its application to the automated segmentation of abdominal organs.
Saito A; Nawano S; Shimizu A
Med Image Anal; 2016 Feb; 28():46-65. PubMed ID: 26716720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional superimposition of digital models for individual identification.
Mou QN; Ji LL; Liu Y; Zhou PR; Han MQ; Zhao JM; Cui WT; Chen T; Du SY; Hou YX; Guo YC
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110597. PubMed ID: 33279768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posture normalisation of 3D body scans.
Danckaers F; Huysmans T; Hallemans A; De Bruyne G; Truijen S; Sijbers J
Ergonomics; 2019 Jun; 62(6):834-848. PubMed ID: 30777506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D active shape model segmentation with nonlinear shape priors.
Kirschner M; Becker M; Wesarg S
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 2):492-9. PubMed ID: 21995065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fully automatic segmentation of the femur from 3D-CT images using primitive shape recognition and statistical shape models.
Ben Younes L; Nakajima Y; Saito T
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Mar; 9(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 24101434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between different screening strategies to determine the statistical shape model of the pelvises for implant design.
Shih KS; Hsu CP; Liu CW; Wang LL; Hou SM; Lin SC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Sep; 178():265-273. PubMed ID: 31416554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated segmentation of the femur and pelvis from 3D CT data of diseased hip using hierarchical statistical shape model of joint structure.
Yokota F; Okada T; Takao M; Sugano N; Tada Y; Sato Y
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):811-8. PubMed ID: 20426186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computation of a probabilistic statistical shape model in a maximum-a-posteriori framework.
Hufnagel H; Pennec X; Ehrhardt J; Ayache N; Handels H
Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 19562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pair-wise vs group-wise registration in statistical shape model construction: representation of physiological and pathological variability of bony surface morphology.
Cerveri P; Belfatto A; Manzotti A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 May; 22(7):772-787. PubMed ID: 30931618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional image registration as a tool for forensic odontology: a preliminary investigation.
Abduo J; Bennamoun M
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 34(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 23877240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated liver segmentation from a postmortem CT scan based on a statistical shape model.
Saito A; Yamamoto S; Nawano S; Shimizu A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Feb; 12(2):205-221. PubMed ID: 27659283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical relevance of augmented statistical shape model of the scapula in the glenoid region.
Salhi A; Burdin V; Brochard S; Mutsvangwa TE; Borotikar B
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Feb; 76():88-94. PubMed ID: 31902570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dental and alveolar arch forms in a Caucasian population compared with commercially available archwires.
Lombardo L; Fattori L; Molinari C; Mirabella D; Siciliani G
Int Orthod; 2013 Dec; 11(4):389-421. PubMed ID: 24269725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual reconstruction of bilateral midfacial defects by using statistical shape modeling.
Fuessinger MA; Schwarz S; Neubauer J; Cornelius CP; Gass M; Poxleitner P; Zimmerer R; Metzger MC; Schlager S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1054-1059. PubMed ID: 30982558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [
Xu XX; Cao Y; Zhao YJ; Jia L; Xie QF
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 33550336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical Shape Models: Understanding and Mastering Variation in Anatomy.
Ambellan F; Lamecker H; von Tycowicz C; Zachow S
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2019; 1156():67-84. PubMed ID: 31338778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shape-aware surface reconstruction from sparse 3D point-clouds.
Bernard F; Salamanca L; Thunberg J; Tack A; Jentsch D; Lamecker H; Zachow S; Hertel F; Goncalves J; Gemmar P
Med Image Anal; 2017 May; 38():77-89. PubMed ID: 28282642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D superimposition of human dentition contours in personal identification: A preliminary study.
Yu J; Wang M; Zhou Y; Jin X; Wang F; Sun J; Hao W; Yuan L; Li Y
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):329-336. PubMed ID: 37861195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
