114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3648549)
1. Think before you search.
Northrop CE
Nursing; 1987 Jul; 17(7):59. PubMed ID: 3648549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nurses 'disturbed' by new regulations.
Occup Health Saf; 1989 Mar; 58(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 2710464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Supreme Court decision penalizes independent judgment. As I see it.
Cornu-Quinn C
Am Nurse; 1994; 26(7):5, 28. PubMed ID: 8067641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme Court rules NLRB erred re "supervisory nurses".
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jul; 35(2):1. PubMed ID: 8066179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The third age. Documentation for the RCI.
Hurst C
Aust Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 21(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 1958150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Failing to chart can cost you your job! Case in point: Alexander v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources (484 So. 2d 722-LA).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 May; 26(12):4. PubMed ID: 3636939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hang on to your rights when faced with a sell-off.
Buswell C
Nurs Times; 2000 Jul; 96(30 Suppl):11-2. PubMed ID: 11963428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Constitutional complaint rejected].
Pflege Z; 2016 Apr; 69(4):197. PubMed ID: 27218130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. Supreme Court decision of N.L.R.B. v. Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America.
Pendergast J; Wagner B
Stat; 1994 Jul; 63(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 8029822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nursing practice implications of court decision.
Oreg Nurse; 1994 Dec; 59(4):suppl E1. PubMed ID: 7724201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. R.N. searches patient-death results: criminal charges. Case in point: people v. Coe (501 N.Y.S. 2d 997-NY).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Jul; 27(2):2. PubMed ID: 3637903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Baden-Württemberg curtails specialist quota. Requests for personnel will be revised].
Pflege Z; 2016 Mar; 69(3):134. PubMed ID: 27182578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nursing home 'understaffed' death results: damages awarded. Case on point: Rose Care Inc. v. Ross, 2005 WL 1283679 S.W.3d-AR.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jun; 46(1):2. PubMed ID: 16047730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Supreme Court decision questions employment status of nurses.
N J Nurse; 1995; 25(1):5. PubMed ID: 7731785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New York facility owner accused of Medicaid fraud.
Childs N
Provider; 2000 Feb; 26(2):17. PubMed ID: 10787749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. ABC's Lateline mid-July on residential aged care.
Thomas L
Aust Nurs J; 2013 Aug; 21(2):1. PubMed ID: 24003466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Failure to "spoon feed" patient: no expert needed. Case in point: Beverly Enterprises-Virginia v. Nichols 441 S.E. 2d 1--VA (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 May; 34(12):4. PubMed ID: 8016317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Position of the German Nurses' Association on the regulation for minimum personnel requirements for nursing homes].
Pomykala B
Krankenpflege (Frankf); 1982 Sep; 36(9):289-90. PubMed ID: 6813594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Where to from here for aged care?
Mulrine L
Nurs N Z; 2008 Oct; 14(10):33. PubMed ID: 19024594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Unlicensed nurse assaults visitor: employer liability. Case in point: Deerings West Nursing Center v. Scott (787 S.W. 2d 494--TX (1990).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jul; 31(2):2. PubMed ID: 2377730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
