BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3648602)

  • 1. Are you going stale?
    Wilkinson R
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Jul; 18(7):74-5. PubMed ID: 3648602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The manager's challenge.
    Alexander GR
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):3-6. PubMed ID: 2640600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding, evaluating and improving nursing productivity.
    Williamson WJ; Johnston J
    Nurs Manage; 1988 May; 19(5):49-50, 52, 54. PubMed ID: 3368148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluations.
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):vii-xvi, 1-160. PubMed ID: 2640597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluating performance to guarantee a high standard].
    Pins JA; Hardie CG
    Rev Enferm; 1987 Dec; 10(112 Suppl):4-7. PubMed ID: 3438684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychological preparedness.
    Christensen PB; Cogdell CH
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):7-18. PubMed ID: 2640604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing the performance appraisal system.
    Pelle D; Greenhalgh L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Dec; 18(12):37-40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 3696616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing a primary nursing performance appraisal tool.
    Beck S
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 2294492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of evaluation on the worker].
    Ksykiewicz-Dorota A
    Pieleg Polozna; 1983; (2-3):11-2. PubMed ID: 6553915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
    Martin V
    Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating personnel with automated management systems.
    Brady M
    Nurs Manage; 1988 Jul; 19(7):38-9. PubMed ID: 3386954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. C-R-A-Mming for good nursing supervision Comprehensive Random Achievement Monitor.
    Price SL
    Nurs Manage; 1988 Aug; 19(8):80A-80B, 80F, 80H. PubMed ID: 3399218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personnel decisions: "wheeling" toward better performance.
    Casebeer L
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Aug; 21(8):42-4. PubMed ID: 2381600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Participative employee evaluation.
    Breeden SA
    J Nurs Adm; 1978 May; 8(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 246911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activity contracting.
    Anderson M
    Superv Nurse; 1979 Nov; 10(11):55-9. PubMed ID: 260323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance feedback: a question of source credibility.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):17, 39. PubMed ID: 3633964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Essentials of management. Communicating the basics.
    Scammell B
    Nurs Times; 1990 Mar 28-Apr 3; 86(13):34-7. PubMed ID: 2320449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of charge nurses].
    NowomiƄska A
    Pieleg Polozna; 1984; 9():9-10, 33. PubMed ID: 6570258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.