These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3648733)

  • 1. Midwives' journal. When technology takes over.
    Nurs Times; 1987 May 20-26; 83(20):62-3. PubMed ID: 3648733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Midwives' Journal. The consequences of fetal rights.
    Kroll D
    Nurs Times; 1987 Feb 18-24; 83(7):59-60. PubMed ID: 3645628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midwives' Journal.
    Nurs Times; 1987 Feb 18-24; 83(7):57-64. PubMed ID: 3645627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modern birth technology and human rights.
    Knoppers BM
    Am J Comp Law; 1985; 33(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 16100800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Midwives' Journal. The midwives' mandate.
    Flint C
    Nurs Times; 1987 Sep 23-29; 83(38):67. PubMed ID: 3684633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Midwives' journal. Every woman's rights.
    Kargar I
    Nurs Times; 1992 Feb 26-Mar 3; 88(9):66. PubMed ID: 1553310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Male midwives: will they be denied a chance?
    Blackford N; Devlin R
    Nurs Mirror; 1981 Apr; 152(16):8-9. PubMed ID: 6908724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Midwives' journal. Male delivery.
    Kaur S; Clasper C
    Nurs Times; 1993 Feb 10-16; 89(6):62-3. PubMed ID: 8437941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Costa Rica's absolute ban on in vitro fertilization deemed a human rights violation: implications for U.S. assisted reproductive technology policy and "personhood" initiatives.
    Crockin SL; Ribas D; Escalante G; Nussbaum L; Jones HW
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 23725805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Fertilization in vitro--an enforceable right?].
    van Eikema Hommes GA
    TVZ; 1990 Nov; (22):734-5. PubMed ID: 2136281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Midwives' Journal. Independent midwives: threat or stimulus?
    Kargar I
    Nurs Times; 1987 Nov 11-17; 83(45):69. PubMed ID: 3697212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Midwives' Journal.
    Nurs Times; 1990 Jun 6-12; 86(23):69-76. PubMed ID: 2359705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Midwives' Journal.
    Nurs Times; 1989 Feb 8-14; 85(6):69-76. PubMed ID: 2928213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Midwives' Journal.
    Nurs Times; 1988 Jun 15-21; 84(24):61-8. PubMed ID: 3393477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Access to in vitro fertilization deserves increased regulation in the United States.
    Murphy JB
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2013; 39(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 23252634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midwives' Journal.
    Nurs Times; 1988 Nov 16-22; 84(46):57-64. PubMed ID: 3211780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Midwives' Journal.
    Nurs Times; 1986 Sep 10-16; 82(37):61-8. PubMed ID: 3639485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Midwives' Journal. Dispelling the myths on direct entry training.
    Downe S
    Nurs Times; 1986 Sep 10-16; 82(37):63-4. PubMed ID: 3639486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midwives' Journal. A document of the past.
    NcNabb M
    Nurs Times; 1986 Sep 10-16; 82(37):66. PubMed ID: 3639488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Midwives' journal.
    Nurs Times; 1987 May 20-26; 83(20):57-64. PubMed ID: 3648730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.