These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36493665)

  • 21. Diurnal landfill methane flux patterns across different seasons at a landfill in Southeastern US.
    Delkash M; Chow FK; Imhoff PT
    Waste Manag; 2022 May; 144():76-86. PubMed ID: 35316706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lateral gas transport in soil adjacent to an old landfill: factors governing emissions and methane oxidation.
    Christophersen M; Kjeldsen P; Holst H; Chanton J
    Waste Manag Res; 2001 Dec; 19(6):595-612. PubMed ID: 12201690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measuring methane emissions from a UK landfill using the tracer dispersion method and the influence of operational and environmental factors.
    Rees-White TC; Mønster J; Beaven RP; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():870-882. PubMed ID: 29605306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-term landfill methane emissions dependency on wind.
    Delkash M; Zhou B; Han B; Chow FK; Rella CW; Imhoff PT
    Waste Manag; 2016 Sep; 55():288-98. PubMed ID: 26896003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Seasonal characteristics of odor and methane mitigation and the bacterial community dynamics in an on-site biocover at a sanitary landfill.
    Lee YY; Jung H; Ryu HW; Oh KC; Jeon JM; Cho KS
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():277-286. PubMed ID: 29089227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methodologies for measuring fugitive methane emissions from landfills - A review.
    Mønster J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():835-859. PubMed ID: 30660403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the efficiency of an experimental biocover to reduce BTEX emissions from landfill biogas.
    Lakhouit A; Schirmer WN; Johnson TR; Cabana H; Cabral AR
    Chemosphere; 2014 Feb; 97():98-101. PubMed ID: 24238915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Availability and properties of materials for the Fakse Landfill biocover.
    Pedersen GB; Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2011 May; 31(5):884-94. PubMed ID: 21185710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of a landfill methane emission screening method using an unmanned aerial vehicle mounted thermal infrared camera - A field study.
    Fjelsted L; Christensen AG; Larsen JE; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():893-904. PubMed ID: 29853253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of Landfill Gas Exposure on Vegetation in Engineered Landfill Biocover Systems Implemented to Minimize Fugitive Methane Emissions from Landfills.
    Attalage DS; Hettiaratchi JPA; Chu A; Pokhrel D; Jayasinghe PA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Temporal variability of soil gas composition in landfill covers.
    Gebert J; Rachor I; Gröngröft A; Pfeiffer EM
    Waste Manag; 2011 May; 31(5):935-45. PubMed ID: 21074982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantification of methane and carbon dioxide surface emissions from a metropolitan landfill based on quasi-continuous eddy covariance measurement.
    Kang M; Cho S; Lee Y; Lee KH; Sohn S; Choi SW; Kim J; Park J
    Waste Manag; 2024 Sep; 186():355-365. PubMed ID: 38964055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and implementation of a screening method to categorise the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of 91 landfills.
    Fredenslund AM; Mønster J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():915-923. PubMed ID: 29563053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of respiration in compost landfill biocovers intended for methane oxidation.
    Scheutz C; Pedicone A; Pedersen GB; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2011 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 21292472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mitigating fugitive methane emissions from closed landfills: A pilot-scale field study.
    Nelson B; Zytner RG; Dulac Y; Cabral AR
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 851(Pt 2):158351. PubMed ID: 36049680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Landfill gas collection efficiency: Categorization of data from existing in-situ measurements.
    Giordano CR; Van Brunt ME; Halevi SJ; Castaldi MJ; Orlovits Z; Illes Z
    Waste Manag; 2024 Mar; 175():83-91. PubMed ID: 38176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of a passively vented field-scale biofilter for the microbial oxidation of landfill methane.
    Gebert J; Gröngröft A
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 16386887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical assessment of dumpsite soil suitability to enhance methane bio-oxidation under interactive influence of substrates and temperature.
    Bajar S; Singh A; Kaushik CP; Kaushik A
    Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():188-195. PubMed ID: 28063834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mitigation of methane and trace gas emissions through a large-scale active biofilter system at Glatved landfill, Denmark.
    Duan Z; Hansen POR; Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2021 May; 126():367-376. PubMed ID: 33813314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of atmospheric pressure on landfill methane emissions.
    Czepiel PM; Shorter JH; Mosher B; Allwine E; McManus JB; Harriss RC; Kolb CE; Lamb BK
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(7):593-8. PubMed ID: 12957154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.