178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36494203)
1. Post-Dobbs legal conundrums surrounding preimplantation in vitro fertilization embryo dispositions.
Crockin S; Altman AB; Rinehart L
Fertil Steril; 2023 Jan; 119(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 36494203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disposition of unused cryopreserved embryos: opportunities and liabilities.
Klock SC; Lindheim SR
Fertil Steril; 2023 Jan; 119(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 36370888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genesis retold: legal issues raised by the cryopreservation of preimplantation human embryos.
Saltarelli JJ
Syracuse Law Rev; 1985; 36(3):1021-53. PubMed ID: 16086476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Politics of reproduction: a view from Israel on the Dobbs decision.
Shalev C
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2023 Jan; 12(1):3. PubMed ID: 36694241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
Clark BR
Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.
Feinberg EC; Kawwass JF; Cedars MI
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):557-559. PubMed ID: 35861359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
Cuva AJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Advancing Birth Equity in a Post-Dobbs US.
Crear-Perry J; Hassan A; Daniel S
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1689-1690. PubMed ID: 36318120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-vitro fertilization, frozen embryos, and the right to privacy--are mandatory donation laws constitutional?
Schaefer K
Pac Law J; 1990 Oct; 22(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 16047419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A Case of Restrictions on Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care.
Easter SR; Johnson CT
NEJM Evid; 2023 Jan; 2(1):EVIDe2200294. PubMed ID: 38320058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A ray of light about frozen embryos.
Clayton EW
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Dec; 2(4):347-59. PubMed ID: 11645754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tubal Sterilization Requests at a Single Institution Following the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
Liang AC; Gliwa C; Loder CM; Dalton VK; Smith RD
JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(4):374-375. PubMed ID: 37490094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Where Does Life Begin? Discerning the Impact of
Daar J
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 38088601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disposition of cryopreserved preembryos after divorce.
Windsor KH
Iowa Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 88(4):1001-34. PubMed ID: 15214352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Chilling aspects of procreation.
Zwart-Hendrikx N
Med Law; 2002; 21(3):567-86. PubMed ID: 12437204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Emerging post-Dobbs liability concerns for providers handling embryos.
Crockin SL; Nardi FE
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 36(4):223-227. PubMed ID: 38743646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. J.B. v. M.B.
New Jersey. Superior Court. Appellate Division
Wests Atl Report; 2000; 751():613-20. PubMed ID: 16285110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
