These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36494203)
21. J.B. v. M.B. New Jersey. Superior Court. Appellate Division Wests Atl Report; 2000; 751():613-20. PubMed ID: 16285110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Beyond Balancing: Rethinking the Law of Embryo Disposition. Ziegler M Am Univ Law Rev; 2018; 68(2):515-67. PubMed ID: 30707003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Permanent Sterilization in Nulliparous Patients: Is Legislative Anxiety an Indication for Surgery? Hennessey C; Johnson C; McLaren H; Bhardwaj N; Rivlin K; Chor J J Clin Ethics; 2023; 34(4):320-327. PubMed ID: 37991729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion restrictions: the case for conscientious non-compliance on the part of providers. Randall P; Mago J J Med Ethics; 2024 Feb; 50(3):185-189. PubMed ID: 37156603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The state of abortion rights in the US. Davis MF Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of the Dobbs decision on in-vitro fertilization and fertility care. Ulker A; Evans MB; Craig LB Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Aug; 35(4):306-310. PubMed ID: 37266567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Family law conundrums in assisted reproduction. Waldman EA Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 12199239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Procreative liberty and contemporaneous choice: an inalienable rights approach to frozen embryo disputes. Coleman CH Minn Law Rev; 1999 Nov; 84(1):55-127. PubMed ID: 16514764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Disputes over frozen embryos: who wins, who loses, and how do we decide?--An analysis of Davis v. Davis, York v. Jones, and state statutes affecting reproductive choices. Ahnen CD Creighton Law Rev; 1991 Jun; 24(4):1299-357. PubMed ID: 16130262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. No ABA embryo policy. Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A5. PubMed ID: 11647577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Kass v. Kass. New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department Wests N Y Suppl; 1997 Sep; 663():581-602. PubMed ID: 12041117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion. Macklin R Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Anti-Abortion Exceptionalism after Sepper E J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):612-617. PubMed ID: 38088619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Medicine's troubling bonus: surplus of human embryos. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():1, 32. PubMed ID: 11647519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Embryo donation: unresolved legal issues in the transfer of surplus cryopreserved embryos. Kindregan CP; McBrien M Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(1):169-206. PubMed ID: 16485374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. To dispose or not to dispose: questioning the fate of preembryos after a divorce in J.B. v. M.B. Issa F Houst Law Rev; 2003; 39(5):1549-90. PubMed ID: 15212012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America. Byron JJ; Avalos M; Xiao KA; Klein AA; Leheste JR Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32100. PubMed ID: 36601141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The present standing of the human embryo in U.S. law. Avila D Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(2):203-26. PubMed ID: 12854540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Sperm, egg, and a petri dish. Unveiling the underlying property issues surrounding cryopreserved embryos. Langley LS; Blackston JW J Leg Med; 2006 Jun; 27(2):167-206. PubMed ID: 16728352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]