149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36495146)
1. Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques.
Tosun ON; Bilmenoglu C; Özdemir AK
J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):e64-e70. PubMed ID: 36495146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
Hwang HJ; Lee SJ; Park EJ; Yoon HI
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 30006217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
Yoon HI; Hwang HJ; Ohkubo C; Han JS; Park EJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29961610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of build angle on the tissue surface adaptation of maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing.
Jin MC; Yoon HI; Yeo IS; Kim SH; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):473-482. PubMed ID: 31227240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Denture Base Adaptation Fabricated Using Conventional, Subtractive, and Additive Technologies: A Volumetric Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis.
Oğuz Eİ; Kılıçarslan MA; Özcan M; Ocak M; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar; 30(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 33415779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of denture base adaptation performance between pour and other conventional fabrication techniques.
Akaltan F; Batak B; Oguz EI; Orhan K
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):183.e1-183.e5. PubMed ID: 31767202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques.
Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Baba NZ; Kattadiyil MT
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 27112416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptation of Complete Denture Base Fabricated by Conventional, Milling, and 3-D Printing Techniques: An
Masri G; Mortada R; Ounsi H; Alharbi N; Boulos P; Salameh Z
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Apr; 21(4):367-371. PubMed ID: 32584270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do hydrothermal aging and microwave sterilization affect the trueness of milled, additive manufactured and injection molded denture bases?
Wemken G; Spies BC; Pieralli S; Adali U; Beuer F; Wesemann C
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():103975. PubMed ID: 32781402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of surface adaptation of complete denture bases fabricated using milling, material jetting, selective laser sintering, digital light processing, and conventional injection molding.
Schubert O; Edelhoff D; Erdelt KJ; Nold E; Güth JF
Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 35060369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of fabrication techniques on denture base adaptation: An in vitro study.
Hsu CY; Yang TC; Wang TM; Lin LD
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):740-747. PubMed ID: 32448642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Fit of Dentures Fabricated by Traditional Techniques Versus CAD/CAM Technology.
McLaughlin JB; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):428-435. PubMed ID: 29136309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing: A clinical study.
Yoon SN; Oh KC; Lee SJ; Han JS; Yoon HI
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 31926657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of trueness in a denture base fabricated by using CAD-CAM systems and adaptation to the socketed surface of denture base: An in vitro study.
You SM; You SG; Lee BI; Kim JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 33239193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Trueness of Obturator Prosthesis Base Manufactured by Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques.
Alfaraj A; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34048118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trueness assessment of additively manufactured maxillary complete denture bases produced at different orientations.
Cameron AB; Evans JL; Abuzar MA; Tadakamadla SK; Love RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 35260254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of 3D printed complete denture bases.
Song S; Zhang J; Liu M; Li F; Bai S
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104435. PubMed ID: 36693587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Dimensional Changes Between CAD-CAM Milled Complete Denture Bases and 3D Printed Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Study.
Helal MA; Abdelrahim RA; Zeidan AAE
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(S1):11-19. PubMed ID: 35524633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional processing deformation of three denture base materials.
Artopoulos A; Juszczyk AS; Rodriguez JM; Clark RK; Radford DR
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 24189112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of digital surface displacements of maxillary dentures based on noninvasive anatomic landmarks.
Norvell NG; Korioth TV; Cagna DR; Versluis A
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 29429839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
