These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36495227)

  • 1. Perception of timbre in adult Cochlear implant users: Comparison of Iranian and Western musical instruments.
    Dasdar S; Nasresfahani A; Kianfar N; Zarandi MM; Mobedshahi F; Dabiri S; Kouhi A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2023 Jan; 24(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 36495227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Wright R; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):350-65; quiz 379. PubMed ID: 22533978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.
    McDermott HJ
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):49-82. PubMed ID: 15497033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Music and lexical tone perception in Chinese adult cochlear implant users.
    Wang S; Liu B; Dong R; Zhou Y; Li J; Qi B; Chen X; Han D; Zhang L
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 22362607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.
    Heng J; Cantarero G; Elhilali M; Limb CJ
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):192-200. PubMed ID: 21664263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Olszewski C; Knutson JF; Turner C; Gantz B
    J Music Ther; 2012; 49(1):68-101. PubMed ID: 22803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Knutson JF; Woodworth G; Witt S; DeBus B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Feb; 9(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 9493937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implant users rely on tempo rather than on pitch information during perception of musical emotion.
    Caldwell M; Rankin SK; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S114-20. PubMed ID: 26561882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of instrument timbre on musical emotion recognition in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Warner B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):EL535. PubMed ID: 32611176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.
    Kang R; Nimmons GL; Drennan W; Longnion J; Ruffin C; Nie K; Won JH; Worman T; Yueh B; Rubinstein J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 19474735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Olszewski C; Rychener M; Sena K; Knutson JF; Witt S; Macpherson B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15937406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jiam NT; Deroche ML; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 20(3):247-262. PubMed ID: 30815761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Music perception and training for pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Jiam NT; Limb C
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2020 Nov; 17(11):1193-1206. PubMed ID: 33090055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Knutson JF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 20085197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.