BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36497378)

  • 1. Multi-Stage Classification-Based Deep Learning for Gleason System Grading Using Histopathological Images.
    Hammouda K; Khalifa F; Alghamdi NS; Darwish H; El-Baz A
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Nov; 14(23):. PubMed ID: 36497378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Deep Learning Pipeline for Grade Groups Classification Using Digitized Prostate Biopsy Specimens.
    Hammouda K; Khalifa F; El-Melegy M; Ghazal M; Darwish HE; Abou El-Ghar M; El-Baz A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(20):. PubMed ID: 34695922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.
    Lucas M; Jansen I; Savci-Heijink CD; Meijer SL; de Boer OJ; van Leeuwen TG; de Bruin DM; Marquering HA
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Jul; 475(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31098801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic diagnosis and grading of Prostate Cancer with weakly supervised learning on whole slide images.
    Xiang J; Wang X; Wang X; Zhang J; Yang S; Yang W; Han X; Liu Y
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jan; 152():106340. PubMed ID: 36481762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epithelium segmentation and automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer via deep learning in label-free multiphoton microscopic images.
    Yang Q; Xu Z; Liao C; Cai J; Huang Y; Chen H; Tao X; Huang Z; Chen J; Dong J; Zhu X
    J Biophotonics; 2020 Feb; 13(2):e201900203. PubMed ID: 31710780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binary semantic segmentation for detection of prostate adenocarcinoma using an ensemble with attention and residual U-Net architectures.
    Damkliang K; Thongsuksai P; Kayasut K; Wongsirichot T; Jitsuwan C; Boonpipat T
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1767. PubMed ID: 38192468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
    Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
    Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.
    Kott O; Linsley D; Amin A; Karagounis A; Jeffers C; Golijanin D; Serre T; Gershman B
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 31767543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-Learning for Weakly Supervised Gleason Grading of Local Patterns.
    Silva-Rodriguez J; Colomer A; Dolz J; Naranjo V
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Aug; 25(8):3094-3104. PubMed ID: 33621184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer.
    Nishio M; Matsuo H; Kurata Y; Sugiyama O; Fujimoto K
    Cancers (Basel); 2023 Feb; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 36900325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep learning-based six-type classifier for lung cancer and mimics from histopathological whole slide images: a retrospective study.
    Yang H; Chen L; Cheng Z; Yang M; Wang J; Lin C; Wang Y; Huang L; Chen Y; Peng S; Ke Z; Li W
    BMC Med; 2021 Mar; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 33775248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classifying Malignancy in Prostate Glandular Structures from Biopsy Scans with Deep Learning.
    Fogarty R; Goldgof D; Hall L; Lopez A; Johnson J; Gadara M; Stoyanova R; Punnen S; Pollack A; Pow-Sang J; Balagurunathan Y
    Cancers (Basel); 2023 Apr; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 37190264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Quantify Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy From Kidney Ultrasonography Images.
    Athavale AM; Hart PD; Itteera M; Cimbaluk D; Patel T; Alabkaa A; Arruda J; Singh A; Rosenberg A; Kulkarni H
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e2111176. PubMed ID: 34028548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
    Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
    Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. WeGleNet: A weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Naranjo V
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Mar; 88():101846. PubMed ID: 33485056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.