These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36497745)

  • 1. Will the "Environmental Fees to Taxes" Affect Firm Charitable Giving?
    Niu F; Wang J; Su W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do the China Pollution Discharge Fee Policy and the Environmental Protection Tax Law affect firm performance during the transitional period?
    Zheng H; He Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(29):44541-44557. PubMed ID: 35137311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental protection tax and the labor income share of companies: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China.
    Xiao Q; Jiang Y; Li R; Xiao S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):41820-41833. PubMed ID: 36640237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-examining the governance effect of China's environmental protection tax.
    Lin Y; Liao L; Yu C; Yang Q
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(22):62325-62340. PubMed ID: 36940026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Valuation Impacts of Environmental Protection Taxes and Regulatory Costs in Heavy-Polluting Industries.
    Tu WJ; Yue XG; Liu W; Crabbe MJC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32244988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of the environmental protection tax law on heavily polluting firms in China.
    Wen H; Deng W; Guo Q
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261342. PubMed ID: 34914798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental protection tax and green innovation of heavily polluting enterprises: A quasi-natural experiment based on the implementation of China's environmental protection tax law.
    Deng J; Yang J; Liu Z; Tan Q
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0286253. PubMed ID: 37319257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental taxes, technological innovation and firm performance: Evidence from China's manufacturing firms.
    Zhao A; Zhang H; Liu Y; Guan H
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e31386. PubMed ID: 38813171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can environmental protection tax force enterprises to improve green technology innovation?
    Li C; Teng Y; Zhou Y; Feng X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(6):9371-9391. PubMed ID: 38190067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is the role of resource tax in sustainable development? A firm-level analysis for China.
    Xiao Q; Liu D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(18):52227-52240. PubMed ID: 36826764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Additional social welfare of environmental regulation: The effect of environmental taxes on income inequality.
    Yang X; Tang W
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 330():117095. PubMed ID: 36584467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differentiated environmental taxes and high-quality economic development in China: theory and evidence.
    Zhou Y; Yang W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; 30(53):114222-114238. PubMed ID: 37858015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Green finance and corporate environmental responsibility: evidence from heavily polluting listed enterprises in China.
    He L; Zhong T; Gan S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(49):74081-74096. PubMed ID: 35643997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental protection subsidies, green technology innovation and environmental performance: Evidence from China's heavy-polluting listed firms.
    Du C; Zhang Q; Huang D
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0278629. PubMed ID: 36735660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do environmental taxes reduce air pollution? Evidence from fossil-fuel power plants in China.
    Li P; Lin Z; Du H; Feng T; Zuo J
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 295():113112. PubMed ID: 34174685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental protection tax and green innovation.
    Wang Y; Xu S; Meng X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(19):56670-56686. PubMed ID: 36920619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of capital-biased tax incentives on firm energy intensity: Environmental dividend or consequence?
    Lin B; Xu C
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 345():118507. PubMed ID: 37421721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of environmental tax reform on corporate profit margins-based on the empirical research of the enterprises in the heavy pollution industries.
    He X; Jing Q
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):36337-36349. PubMed ID: 36547844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Has environmental protection tax reform promoted green transformation of enterprises? Evidence from China.
    Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Q
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Apr; 31(20):29472-29496. PubMed ID: 38578592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of environmental tax laws on heavy-polluting enterprise ESG performance: A stakeholder behavior perspective.
    He X; Jing Q; Chen H
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 344():118578. PubMed ID: 37454448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.