These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36502324)

  • 1. Do They Align? Congruence Between Patient Preferences of People Living with Cognitive Impairments and Physicians' Judgements for Person-Centered Care: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study.
    Mohr W; Rädke A; Afi A; Weber N; Platen M; Mühlichen F; Scharf A; Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2023; 91(2):727-741. PubMed ID: 36502324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elicitation of quantitative, choice-based preferences for Person-Centered Care among People living with Dementia in comparison to physicians' judgements in Germany: study protocol for the mixed-methods PreDemCare-study.
    Mohr W; Rädke A; Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W
    BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jul; 22(1):567. PubMed ID: 35804302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care-Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey.
    Mohr W; Rädke A; Afi A; Mühlichen F; Platen M; Scharf A; Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process.
    Mohr W; Rädke A; Afi A; Mühlichen F; Platen M; Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient preferences versus physicians' judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making?
    Mühlbacher AC; Juhnke C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Jun; 11(3):163-80. PubMed ID: 23529716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring patients' priorities using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in comparison with Best-Worst-Scaling and rating cards: methodological aspects and ranking tasks.
    Schmidt K; Babac A; Pauer F; Damm K; von der Schulenburg JM
    Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 27844450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different approaches applied in Analytic Hierarchy Process - an example of information needs of patients with rare diseases.
    Pauer F; Schmidt K; Babac A; Damm K; Frank M; von der Schulenburg JM
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Sep; 16(1):117. PubMed ID: 27613239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Well Can Analytic Hierarchy Process be Used to Elicit Individual Preferences? Insights from a Survey in Patients Suffering from Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
    Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
    Patient; 2016 Oct; 9(5):481-92. PubMed ID: 27255773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation.
    Ijzerman MJ; van Til JA; Bridges JF
    Patient; 2012; 5(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 22185216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences.
    Danner M; Hummel JM; Volz F; van Manen JG; Wiegard B; Dintsios CM; Bastian H; Gerber A; Ijzerman MJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 22004779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
    Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physicians' participatory decision-making and quality of diabetes care processes and outcomes: results from the triad study.
    Heisler M; Tierney E; Ackermann RT; Tseng C; Narayan KM; Crosson J; Waitzfelder B; Safford MM; Duru K; Herman WH; Kim C
    Chronic Illn; 2009 Sep; 5(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 19675116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Priority ranking of Chinese patent medicine prescriptions for type 2 diabetes mellitus (syndrome of deficiency of both Qi and Yin): based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP)].
    Fang J; Xie QY; Meng QG; Meng HY; Luan XJ
    Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 47(8):2237-2243. PubMed ID: 35531740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patients' and physicians' gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai.
    Alameddine M; Otaki F; Bou-Karroum K; Du Preez L; Loubser P; AlGurg R; Alsheikh-Ali A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0270700. PubMed ID: 36048748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
    Hyams T; Golden B; Sammarco J; Sultan S; King-Marshall E; Wang MQ; Curbow B
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jul; 21(1):754. PubMed ID: 34325701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How culture influences patient preferences for patient-centered care with their doctors.
    Sheeran N; Jones L; Pines R; Jin B; Pamoso A; Eigeland J; Benedetti M
    J Commun Healthc; 2023 Jul; 16(2):186-196. PubMed ID: 37401877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does it matter whether physicians' recommendations are given early or late in the decision-making process? An experimental study among patients with schizophrenia.
    Hamann J; Kissling W; Mendel R
    BMJ Open; 2016 Sep; 6(9):e011282. PubMed ID: 27638491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making.
    Torke AM; Moloney R; Siegler M; Abalos A; Alexander GC
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2010 Mar; 58(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 20158556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived involvement and preferences in shared decision-making among patients with hypertension.
    Mah HC; Muthupalaniappen L; Chong WW
    Fam Pract; 2016 Jun; 33(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 26993483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.