434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36502459)
21. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Gillan MG; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Lim YY; Purushothaman H; Strudley C; Astley SM; Morrish O; Young KC; Duffy SW
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. PubMed ID: 25599513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Retrospective comparison between single reading plus an artificial intelligence algorithm and two-view digital tomosynthesis with double reading in breast screening.
Graewingholt A; Duffy S
J Med Screen; 2021 Sep; 28(3):365-368. PubMed ID: 33402033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Community-Based Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Comparison of Screening Performance and Tumor Characteristics.
Regen-Tuero HC; Ram S; Gass JS; Lourenco AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Feb; 218(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 34523954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Personalized breast cancer screening with selective addition of digital breast tomosynthesis through artificial intelligence.
Dahlblom V; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S; Dustler M
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Feb; 10(Suppl 2):S22408. PubMed ID: 37274777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms.
Kühl J; Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Rasmussen BSB; Nielsen M; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Graumann O
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3935-3946. PubMed ID: 37938386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) instead of mammography on population screening outcomes including interval cancer rates: Results of the Trento DBT pilot evaluation.
Bernardi D; Gentilini MA; De Nisi M; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Luparia A; Houssami N
Breast; 2020 Apr; 50():135-140. PubMed ID: 31607526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: Is independent double reading still required?
Weigel S; Hense HW; Weyer-Elberich V; Gerss J; Heindel W
Rofo; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38295824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Teuwen J; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4825-4832. PubMed ID: 30993432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening.
Caumo F; Romanucci G; Hunter K; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Macaskill P; Houssami N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 29557996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Artificial Intelligence as Supporting Reader in Breast Screening: A Novel Workflow to Preserve Quality and Reduce Workload.
Ng AY; Glocker B; Oberije C; Fox G; Sharma N; James JJ; Ambrózay É; Nash J; Karpati E; Kerruish S; Kecskemethy PD
J Breast Imaging; 2023 May; 5(3):267-276. PubMed ID: 38416889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Sebuødegård S; Bandos AI; Gur D; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Hofvind S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jun; 169(3):489-496. PubMed ID: 29429017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Recall and False-Positive Rates by Time of Day and Reader Experience.
Bernstein MH; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 35014905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence.
Lång K; Dustler M; Dahlblom V; Åkesson A; Andersson I; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1687-1692. PubMed ID: 32876835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
