174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36502700)
1. Prioritization of mixtures of neurotoxic chemicals for biomonitoring using high-throughput toxicokinetics and mixture toxicity modeling.
Braun G; Escher BI
Environ Int; 2023 Jan; 171():107680. PubMed ID: 36502700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mixture risk assessment and human biomonitoring: Lessons learnt from HBM4EU.
Luijten M; Vlaanderen J; Kortenkamp A; Antignac JP; Barouki R; Bil W; van den Brand A; den Braver-Sewradj S; van Klaveren J; Mengelers M; Ottenbros I; Rantakokko P; Kolossa-Gehring M; Lebret E
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2023 Apr; 249():114135. PubMed ID: 36758443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human risk associated with exposure to mixtures of antiandrogenic chemicals evaluated using in vitro hazard and human biomonitoring data.
Ma Y; Taxvig C; Rodríguez-Carrillo A; Mustieles V; Reiber L; Kiesow A; Löbl NM; Fernández MF; Hansen TVA; Valente MJ; Kolossa-Gehring M; David M; Vinggaard AM
Environ Int; 2023 Mar; 173():107815. PubMed ID: 36822008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying populations sensitive to environmental chemicals by simulating toxicokinetic variability.
Ring CL; Pearce RG; Setzer RW; Wetmore BA; Wambaugh JF
Environ Int; 2017 Sep; 106():105-118. PubMed ID: 28628784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro screening for population variability in toxicity of pesticide-containing mixtures.
Abdo N; Wetmore BA; Chappell GA; Shea D; Wright FA; Rusyn I
Environ Int; 2015 Dec; 85():147-55. PubMed ID: 26386728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to analyse and account for interactions in mixture toxicity with toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic models.
Bart S; Short S; Jager T; Eagles EJ; Robinson A; Badder C; Lahive E; Spurgeon DJ; Ashauer R
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 843():157048. PubMed ID: 35779734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling and human biomonitoring data for mixture risk assessment.
Pletz J; Blakeman S; Paini A; Parissis N; Worth A; Andersson AM; Frederiksen H; Sakhi AK; Thomsen C; Bopp SK
Environ Int; 2020 Oct; 143():105978. PubMed ID: 32763630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting the Metal Mixture Toxicity with a Toxicokinetic-Toxicodynamic Model Considering the Time-Dependent Adverse Outcome Pathways.
Yang L; Zeng J; Gao N; Zhu L; Feng J
Environ Sci Technol; 2024 Feb; 58(8):3714-3725. PubMed ID: 38350648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of biotic ligand and toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modeling to predict the accumulation and toxicity of metal mixtures to zebrafish larvae.
Gao Y; Feng J; Han F; Zhu L
Environ Pollut; 2016 Jun; 213():16-29. PubMed ID: 26874871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An approach for mixture testing and prioritization based on common kinetic groups.
Braeuning A; Bloch D; Karaca M; Kneuer C; Rotter S; Tralau T; Marx-Stoelting P
Arch Toxicol; 2022 Jun; 96(6):1661-1671. PubMed ID: 35306572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterisation of the risk associated with chronic lifetime exposure to mixture of chemical hazards: case study of trace elements.
Gastellu T; Le Bizec B; Rivière G
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2023 Aug; 40(8):951-970. PubMed ID: 37428801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-throughput PBTK models for
Breen M; Ring CL; Kreutz A; Goldsmith MR; Wambaugh JF
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):903-921. PubMed ID: 34056988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporating High-Throughput Exposure Predictions With Dosimetry-Adjusted In Vitro Bioactivity to Inform Chemical Toxicity Testing.
Wetmore BA; Wambaugh JF; Allen B; Ferguson SS; Sochaski MA; Setzer RW; Houck KA; Strope CL; Cantwell K; Judson RS; LeCluyse E; Clewell HJ; Thomas RS; Andersen ME
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Nov; 148(1):121-36. PubMed ID: 26251325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined chemical exposure using exposure loads on human biomonitoring data of the 4th Flemish Environment and Health Study (FLEHS-4).
Buekers J; Verheyen V; Remy S; Covaci A; Colles A; Koppen G; Govarts E; Bruckers L; Leermakers M; St-Amand A; Schoeters G
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2021 Sep; 238():113849. PubMed ID: 34547602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards a systematic use of effect biomarkers in population and occupational biomonitoring.
Zare Jeddi M; Hopf NB; Viegas S; Price AB; Paini A; van Thriel C; Benfenati E; Ndaw S; Bessems J; Behnisch PA; Leng G; Duca RC; Verhagen H; Cubadda F; Brennan L; Ali I; David A; Mustieles V; Fernandez MF; Louro H; Pasanen-Kase R
Environ Int; 2021 Jan; 146():106257. PubMed ID: 33395925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying Chemicals and Mixtures of Potential Biological Concern Detected in Passive Samplers from Great Lakes Tributaries Using High-Throughput Data and Biological Pathways.
Alvarez DA; Corsi SR; De Cicco LA; Villeneuve DL; Baldwin AK
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Aug; 40(8):2165-2182. PubMed ID: 34003517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementing in vitro bioactivity data to modernize priority setting of chemical inventories.
Beal MA; Gagne M; Kulkarni SA; Patlewicz G; Thomas RS; Barton-Maclaren TS
ALTEX; 2022; 39(1):123-139. PubMed ID: 34818430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational Modeling of Mixture Toxicity.
Chatterjee M; Roy K
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2425():561-587. PubMed ID: 35188647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying and Prioritizing Chemicals with Uncertain Burden of Exposure: Opportunities for Biomonitoring and Health-Related Research.
Pellizzari ED; Woodruff TJ; Boyles RR; Kannan K; Beamer PI; Buckley JP; Wang A; Zhu Y; Bennett DH;
Environ Health Perspect; 2019 Dec; 127(12):126001. PubMed ID: 31850800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical review and analysis of literature on low dose exposure to chemical mixtures in mammalian
Elcombe CS; Evans NP; Bellingham M
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2022 Mar; 52(3):221-238. PubMed ID: 35894754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
