BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36503552)

  • 1. Comparative single-center study between modified laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Li X; Pei X; Li H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Wei Z; Yin Z
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 20(1):392. PubMed ID: 36503552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Lv X; Ding B; Xu J; Shen Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 37270549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of modified no-touch laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on outcomes of early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
    He F; Yuan S; Chen X; Zhang S; Han Y; Lin T; Xu B; Huang S; Pan Z
    Cancer Med; 2022 Jun; 11(11):2224-2232. PubMed ID: 35156771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
    van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
    Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
    Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: multi-institutional experience in comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
    Ghezzi F; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Uccella S; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Cromi A; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23948703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Role of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.
    Park JY; Kim D; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):825-833. PubMed ID: 27503491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
    Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
    Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer: disease recurrence and survival comparison.
    Toptas T; Simsek T
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Jun; 24(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 24742012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
    Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
    Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
    Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].
    Zhang YN; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):600-608. PubMed ID: 32957748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of tumor
    Zhao J; Liu Q; Jiang D; Chen T; Meng S; Shu C
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Nov; 48(11):1686-1695. PubMed ID: 38432859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in FIGO 2018 early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma: Long-term survival outcomes after propensity score matching.
    Yin Z; Cui Z; Kang S; Ji M; Li D; Chen B; Zhan X; Li W; Liu P; Chen C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Dec; 49(12):2849-2859. PubMed ID: 37658744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.