These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36503552)

  • 41. Lymph-Vascular Space Invasion in Patients with Stages IA2-IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy.
    Zhao W; Yang Q
    Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():1179-1186. PubMed ID: 33603463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-centre experience from India.
    Sekhon R; Naithani A; Makkar P; R P; Sharma P; Rawal S; Goyal Y; Mitra S; Sharma A; Mehta A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):935-941. PubMed ID: 34709536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Survival associated with extent of radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a subanalysis of the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative study.
    Bizzarri N; Querleu D; Dostálek L; van Lonkhuijzen LRCW; Giannarelli D; Lopez A; Salehi S; Ayhan A; Kim SH; Ortiz DI; Klat J; Landoni F; Pareja R; Manchanda R; Kosťun J; Ramirez PT; Meydanli MM; Odetto D; Laky R; Zapardiel I; Weinberger V; Dos Reis R; Pedone Anchora L; Amaro K; Akilli H; Abu-Rustum NR; Salcedo-Hernández RA; Javůrková V; Mom CH; Scambia G; Falconer H; Cibula D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):428.e1-428.e12. PubMed ID: 37336255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Introduction of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome.
    Wallin E; Flöter Rådestad A; Falconer H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 May; 96(5):536-542. PubMed ID: 28186616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 108(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 23737035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Open nerve-plane sparing radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: evaluation on efficacy and long-term survival outcomes].
    Shu T; Li B; Zhao D; Wang YT; Liu SH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 33486927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
    Pellegrino A; Vizza E; Fruscio R; Villa A; Corrado G; Villa M; Dell'Anna T; Vitobello D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Surgical and Pathological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and/or Para-aortic Lymph Node Sampling for Bulky Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Zhu T; Chen X; Zhu J; Chen Y; Yu A; Chen L; Shou H; Wu M; Zhang P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jul; 27(6):1222-1227. PubMed ID: 28640767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Oncologic outcomes of early stage cervical cancer performed operation by different laparoscopic surgical procedures: analysis of clinical data from mutiple centers].
    Ling KJ; Wang YZ; Zhang H; Zhang XY; Yang JJ; Luo CY; Song B; Zhang WX; Deng L; Chen GL; Li YD; Hu QY; Chen Y; Wang X; Zhang J; Ding JX; Ren T; Kang S; Hua KQ; Xiang Y; Cheng WW; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 32957750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.
    Hwang WY; Kim JH; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):975-980. PubMed ID: 32467336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An Australian, single-centre study of surgical management outcomes for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Weishaupt J; Saidi S; Carter J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Feb; 61(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 33176013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
    Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
    Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases.
    Chong GO; Park NY; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Nov; 19(8):1459-64. PubMed ID: 20009907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?
    Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Eom JM; Ko JH; Bae JW; Park SH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 22683586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Efficacy evaluation of vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective case series study.
    Wang H; Li D; Wang C; Wang X; Yu M; Zhang X; Li L; Zeng Q; Long Z; Zheng W; Liu G; Wang D
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):124. PubMed ID: 35282041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Safety and efficacy of a modified technique of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Yang N; Fan X; Wang L; Zhu P; Xu P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Nov; 48(11):2879-2887. PubMed ID: 36059077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.