226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36506611)
1. Modern imaging techniques for monitoring patients with multiple myeloma.
Pop VS; Tomoaia G; Parvu A
Med Pharm Rep; 2022 Oct; 95(4):377-384. PubMed ID: 36506611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging in multiple myeloma: How? When?
Zamagni E; Tacchetti P; Cavo M
Blood; 2019 Feb; 133(7):644-651. PubMed ID: 30587527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal Survey in Multiple Myeloma: Role of Imaging.
Spinnato P; Filonzi G; Conficoni A; Facchini G; Ponti F; Sambri A; De Paolis M; Cavo M; Salizzoni E; Nanni C
Curr Med Imaging; 2021; 17(8):956-965. PubMed ID: 33573573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography and advanced imaging techniques for multiple myeloma bone disease.
Pianko MJ; Terpos E; Roodman GD; Divgi CR; Zweegman S; Hillengass J; Lentzsch S
Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Dec; 20(23):5888-97. PubMed ID: 25294899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Zamagni E; Nanni C; Patriarca F; Englaro E; Castellucci P; Geatti O; Tosi P; Tacchetti P; Cangini D; Perrone G; Ceccolini M; Brioli A; Buttignol S; Fanin R; Salizzoni E; Baccarani M; Fanti S; Cavo M
Haematologica; 2007 Jan; 92(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 17229635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective Comparison of 18F-Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in the Initial Workup of Multiple Myeloma: Study Protocol of a Prospective Imaging Trial.
Mesguich C; Hulin C; Latrabe V; Asselineau J; Bordenave L; Perez P; Hindie E; Marit G
JMIR Res Protoc; 2020 Sep; 9(9):e17850. PubMed ID: 32909953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging of Multiple Myeloma: Present and Future.
Rodríguez-Laval V; Lumbreras-Fernández B; Aguado-Bueno B; Gómez-León N
J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 38202271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple Myeloma Guidelines and Their Recent Updates: Implications for Imaging.
Mosebach J; Thierjung H; Schlemmer HP; Delorme S
Rofo; 2019 Nov; 191(11):998-1009. PubMed ID: 31137045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of whole-body low-dose multidetector CT (WBLDCT) versus skeletal survey in the detection of myelomatous lesions, and correlation of disease distribution with whole-body MRI (WBMRI).
Gleeson TG; Moriarty J; Shortt CP; Gleeson JP; Fitzpatrick P; Byrne B; McHugh J; O'Connell M; O'Gorman P; Eustace SJ
Skeletal Radiol; 2009 Mar; 38(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 19009290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT: a review of diagnostic and prognostic features in multiple myeloma and related disorders.
Dammacco F; Rubini G; Ferrari C; Vacca A; Racanelli V
Clin Exp Med; 2015 Feb; 15(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 25218739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Imaging in smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Past, present and future].
Bhutani M; Landgren O
Radiologe; 2014 Jun; 54(6):572, 574-81. PubMed ID: 24927659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is whole body low dose CT still necessary in the era of
Maggialetti N; Ferrari C; Nappi AG; Quinto A; Rossini B; Zappia M; Minoia C; Guarini A; Brunese L; Rubini G
Hell J Nucl Med; 2020; 23(3):264-271. PubMed ID: 33306757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Myeloma bone and extra-medullary disease: Role of PET/CT and other whole-body imaging techniques.
Rubini G; Niccoli-Asabella A; Ferrari C; Racanelli V; Maggialetti N; Dammacco F
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2016 May; 101():169-83. PubMed ID: 26997302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective study comparing whole-body skeletal X-ray survey with 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of bone lesions in multiple myeloma patients.
Dyrberg E; Hendel HW; Al-Farra G; Balding L; Løgager VB; Madsen C; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol Open; 2017 Oct; 6(10):2058460117738809. PubMed ID: 29123920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Progress of modern imaging modalities in multiple myeloma.
Terao T; Matsue K
Int J Hematol; 2022 Jun; 115(6):778-789. PubMed ID: 35532876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic value of whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) in bone lesions detection in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
Ippolito D; Besostri V; Bonaffini PA; Rossini F; Di Lelio A; Sironi S
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2322-7. PubMed ID: 24074647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of spinal bone marrow infiltration in untreated patients with multiple myeloma.
Hur J; Yoon CS; Ryu YH; Yun MJ; Suh JS
Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 18415787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 11C-choline vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing bone involvement in patients with multiple myeloma.
Nanni C; Zamagni E; Cavo M; Rubello D; Tacchetti P; Pettinato C; Farsad M; Castellucci P; Ambrosini V; Montini GC; Al-Nahhas A; Franchi R; Fanti S
World J Surg Oncol; 2007 Jun; 5():68. PubMed ID: 17584499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparison of 18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of multiple myeloma.
Mesguich C; Hulin C; Latrabe V; Lascaux A; Bordenave L; Hindié E; Marit G
Ann Hematol; 2020 Dec; 99(12):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 32951093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
